Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

Of course, one should never question the evolutionists; their theories should be accepted at face value.

“the specimen is perhaps 110,000 or 130,000 years old.”

“one study claiming they evolved less than 100,000 years ago.”

Ignore any inconsistencies. Of course they existed 30,000 years before they evolved. You have to accept that on faith.


10 posted on 12/10/2007 11:28:56 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35

yes we’re not exactly talking about double blind controlled studies here.


11 posted on 12/10/2007 11:36:14 AM PST by ari-freedom (Happy Chanuka! It’s just another ordinary miracle today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35

You are right. Much better to shut off one’s brain and just say they came into existence 6K years ago,


13 posted on 12/10/2007 11:46:03 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35
Of course they existed 30,000 years before they evolved. You have to accept that on faith.

The prototypes were 110,000-130,000 years ago. Then, just like the auto companies, a bit of trim changes every 10,000 years, and then bring out a 'new' model every 30,000 years.

A sharper hood ornament; thicker upholstery; heated seat cushion; slap on wider, studded whitewalls, and add $1,500 to the base price.

After about 100,000-150,000 years retire the model, and bring out a "new" marque, and add still another $3,000 to the base price, and start over.

17 posted on 12/10/2007 4:24:23 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Liberal hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson