Skip to comments.
Hillary can’t beat Oprah
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^
| 12-10-07
| Jim Wooten
Posted on 12/10/2007 11:04:59 AM PST by tcrlaf
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: Redleg Duke
Was that when Hillary still lived in IL?
41
posted on
12/10/2007 12:33:50 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
To: ASA Vet
Don’t know. Probably not.
42
posted on
12/10/2007 12:35:16 PM PST
by
Redleg Duke
("All gave some, and some gave all!")
To: tcrlaf
This is getting good.
"Jeeves....more popcorn!"
43
posted on
12/10/2007 12:43:56 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
To: Judith Anne
Ooh, thanks for that bit of info...The Oprah will not like that one bit!
By the way, remember when Lieberman said he had Joementum?
44
posted on
12/10/2007 12:44:06 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: napscoordinator
Sad that people would vote for that Obama guy just because of Oprah. That is disgusting!!!I dunno. This is an interesting development. Anyone care to speculate upon the ramifications?
How does Oprah line up? Considering her rise to power on her own hook, I wonder if she'll be to the right of the Clintons'?. Is this a coup? is the Chicago Machine attempting to assert itself in a power play?
Oprah is a player, just by the sheer size of her organization, not to mention one of the biggest wallets in America. I wonder what it means when she comes a'callin' ?
45
posted on
12/10/2007 12:46:52 PM PST
by
roamer_1
(Vote for Frudy McRomsonbee -Turn red states purple in 08!)
To: bmwcyle
Is that a different Big O from the Big O she gives to Big Obedin?
To: seowulf
How dare that Oprah support Obama and campaign against the wife of the first black president.
47
posted on
12/10/2007 12:47:29 PM PST
by
tflabo
To: A_Former_Democrat
I think Hillary is too up tight to experience the big O herself.
48
posted on
12/10/2007 12:51:03 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: tcrlaf
Im sick of politics as usual.
Yes, yes, Oprah - we're all sick and tired of politics as usual, that is, unless it's practiced from our side. Obama mouths pretty words, but in the end he's no different than Hillary and the rest of the liberals that you entertainment types gyrate towards.
Spare us your 'wisdom', sweetie.
49
posted on
12/10/2007 12:51:56 PM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: 50sDad
Not only that Hillary Clinton turned a blind eye on Bill Clinton illegal affairs with many women but she was in charge of shutting down these women and that is by the admission of liberals and the Clintons friends. She did all this not to protect her husband but to protect her incredible lust for power. This will play very badly against Hillary Clinton in the general elections that in addition that she has a fatal character flaw and that is she is the meanest and most unlikable person to run for President in decades. Of course in addition that she is a communist and socially liberal to the most extreme.
50
posted on
12/10/2007 12:58:47 PM PST
by
jveritas
(God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
To: tcrlaf
I agree. Obama’s success or failure depends upon one thing: Oprah’s commitment. If Oprah’s sufficiently committed, she can pull it off.
51
posted on
12/10/2007 1:06:18 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
To: Sacajaweau
"The Nitty-gritty of all this is that the Dems have no one who is both qualified and moral."Neither being qualified nor being moral is a consideration of the 21st century Democrat Party.
52
posted on
12/10/2007 1:11:00 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
To: 50sDad
“I thought she was supposed to be a woman of ACTION!?”
If she had been Bill might not have had to look for action elsewhere.
53
posted on
12/10/2007 1:16:35 PM PST
by
billhilly
(I was republican when republican wasn't cool. (With an apology to Barbara Mandrell.))
To: AU72
This all could get to the point where Big Al comes in to save the day.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mr. Trouble never hangs around
when he hears this mighty sound
HERE I COME TO SAVE THE DAY
You know that MIGHTY MOUTH is on the way
54
posted on
12/10/2007 1:34:11 PM PST
by
RipSawyer
(Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
To: tcrlaf
LOL, I get that 'bubble, bubble, toil and trouble', stirring the giant pot over an open flame imagery, myself.
For some reason, I thought Oprah would go for Hil, both being powerful, left-leaning women from Chicago. And yet, I somehow don't think it's just a race issue for Oprah, either. So I wonder why Oprah didn't go for the only woman running? Oprah might just keep Hil from the White House. And I think Hil's public appearance with her own mom and Chelsea, something that it seems she doesn't ever do, is her own acknowledgment of the pressure. Oprah is hard to beat - 'that's why she's Opraaaaaahhh!'
55
posted on
12/10/2007 1:36:19 PM PST
by
fortunecookie
(Communism/socialism has failed millions, it wasn't right for them - and it isn't right for US.)
To: jveritas
Not only that Hillary Clinton turned a blind eye on Bill Clinton illegal affairs with many women but she was in charge of shutting down these women and that is by the admission of liberals and the Clintons friends. She did all this not to protect her husband but to protect her incredible lust for power. This will play very badly against Hillary Clinton in the general elections that in addition that she has a fatal character flaw and that is she is the meanest and most unlikable person to run for President in decades. Of course in addition that she is a communist and socially liberal to the most extreme.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why are you only listing her best qualities?
56
posted on
12/10/2007 1:37:19 PM PST
by
RipSawyer
(Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
To: webheart
The real question is who will the democrats nominate, Edwards, Biden or Kucinich. They are the only viable candidates Probably Edwards. Smart money from day one, based purely on the process of elimination (certainly not on talent or experience). Evan Bayh could've walked away with the nomination with relative ease had he not conceded it to Hillary from the git-go. He'll be there in '12 if the GOP holds onto the Presidency.
57
posted on
12/10/2007 1:48:33 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: COUNTrecount
Oprah is everthing that Hillary! is not.She didnt inherit her billion dollar wealth or power from anyone, she did it all on her own.She is a true American success story whether you like her or not. That may well be, but I find it fascinating that Oprah pulls out the Southern Drawl when she feels like it and drops it when she feels like it, the same way that Hillary does -- the only difference being that Oprah's drawl comes from her growing years. But both come off fake and superficial, especially when they use it with *particular* crowds.
To: SC DOC
59
posted on
12/10/2007 2:10:46 PM PST
by
Judith Anne
(Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
To: Miss Didi
By the way, remember when Lieberman said he had Joementum? Yes, I do...still funny!
60
posted on
12/10/2007 2:13:31 PM PST
by
Judith Anne
(Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson