Chunga: please surf FR's "guilianitruthfile" for a while.
Harpers? Is that all you got? A leftwing rag’s take on a Republican?
A journalist whose previous writings were pot-shots at Condi Rice???
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2001/07/0072396
Been there, done that.
xzins, I gave you direct sourced facts. The actual flyer from the Romney campaign that shows that 28 out of 30 positions are conservative positions. He has been conservative on fiscal, economic, education, trade, crime, and other issues from the get-go. The liberal label is just plain wrong. I got eyes wide open on Mitt, I’ve read all the critical articles and I know he’s not as right-wing as me (and probably you). But he’s not a “radical liberal” either. Mitt Romney is a genuinely right-of-center family-values fiscal-conservative strong-defense man, and he will govern on the agenda that he is running on.
This leftie journalists calls this ‘vapid’:
“Romney’s speeches and public appearances seem particularly vapid. “There is no place that is more important to the future strength of America than the American home,” he said during a South Carolina stop. “The work that goes on within the walls of a home is the most important work that is ever done in America.” “
Do you agree that preaching about the importance of home and family is ‘vapid’? Do you not realize that *any* politicians words can be cut down this way?
Can you not see that it is a hit-piece?