Posted on 12/10/2007 5:12:59 AM PST by advance_copy
Chunga: please surf FR's "guilianitruthfile" for a while.
Harpers? Is that all you got? A leftwing rag’s take on a Republican?
A journalist whose previous writings were pot-shots at Condi Rice???
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2001/07/0072396
Been there, done that.
xzins, I gave you direct sourced facts. The actual flyer from the Romney campaign that shows that 28 out of 30 positions are conservative positions. He has been conservative on fiscal, economic, education, trade, crime, and other issues from the get-go. The liberal label is just plain wrong. I got eyes wide open on Mitt, I’ve read all the critical articles and I know he’s not as right-wing as me (and probably you). But he’s not a “radical liberal” either. Mitt Romney is a genuinely right-of-center family-values fiscal-conservative strong-defense man, and he will govern on the agenda that he is running on.
This leftie journalists calls this ‘vapid’:
“Romney’s speeches and public appearances seem particularly vapid. “There is no place that is more important to the future strength of America than the American home,” he said during a South Carolina stop. “The work that goes on within the walls of a home is the most important work that is ever done in America.” “
Do you agree that preaching about the importance of home and family is ‘vapid’? Do you not realize that *any* politicians words can be cut down this way?
Can you not see that it is a hit-piece?
I think we can all agree, if we have the courage to admit the truth, no one really wants either of them in office. We are being told by the political intelligensia, they are the only 'viable' choices to beat the other. We are being set up.
I think we can all agree, if we have the courage to admit the truth, no one really wants either of them in office. We are being told by the political intelligensia, they are the only 'viable' choices to beat the other. We the people are being set up to lose either way.
That’s right. We need the courage to reject non-fiscal-conservative Huckabee and non-social-conservative Guiliani and nominate a candidate who can represent all parts of the party. The top 3 candidates who can do that are:
1. Mitt Romney
2. Fred Thompson
3. Duncan Hunter
Curiously, the MSM plays up the 2 most unacceptable nominees. Go figure.
I like Rudy. I voted for him twice for Mayor of New York, and I was prepared to vote for him again in the NY Primary and the general, but after reading about the $700,000 to $800,000 in NY taxpayers money that was spent on security while he visited Judi in Southampton, now I’m not so sure. I told my wife after I read this story in the “NY Post” that this will either seriously wound or end Rudy’s quest for the WH. Republicans have generally been forgiving Rudy for many things these past few months, or looking the other way, but now it’s all coming home to roost. This story has had a serious effect on Rudy’s campaign, and many groups that had been attacking him to no avail will now double their efforts. I think he’s done.
Karma can be painful.
Mayor Giuliani is an excellent leader. I’m thankful he is willing to run for president, (and the other candidates as well), knowing in advance how brutal some people can be.
But rest assured, there are multiple millions of voters who are going to put Rudy in the White House. I hope all of you will be able to find it in your hearts to be happy in spite of the fact our nation will prosper under his leadership.
yeah right. He can’t even lead his own family.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.