Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: america4vr

The current ACLU interpretation of the Constitution under which the country seems to be effectively operating. The one that sets homosexuals aside as special persons with special rights, an official Elite, as it were.


32 posted on 12/10/2007 5:43:17 AM PST by ThanhPhero (di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: ThanhPhero
Well then, I must strenuously disagree that isolating them is unconstitutional.

No one can claim they are being isolated based on their sexuality proclivity. it was a matter of a definitive marker in their blood that would have determined whether or not they were to be segregated, if/when it would have come to that.

Homosexuals who didn't prove positive, would NOT have been isolated, I'm very confident to say.

There are other issues to consider, that is, the nature of vaginal sex not to very much prone to
spreading the virus which is primarily infected via blood during when the female isn't menstruating,
as the female anatomy is designed away from any major blood vessels, whereas anal sex is particularly vulnerable to contact with blood as major blood vessels are located in and around the
(hemmorhoidal inflammation/bleeding)would deem such acts highly dangerous.

37 posted on 12/10/2007 6:02:02 AM PST by america4vr (The ebb and flow of empires have come and gone but America shall forever reign supreme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson