Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I could give a rats behind about greenhouse gases until someone can make a persuasive case for anthropogenic climate change/global warming. So far no one has. I want energy self sufficiency for the U.S. This technique has the extra benefit of being a method for garbage disposal.
1 posted on 12/09/2007 8:11:06 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Sounds good!


2 posted on 12/09/2007 8:13:57 PM PST by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Agreed

Maybe they could turn all the lipids collected from liposuction into oil too? :)


3 posted on 12/09/2007 8:23:33 PM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Since carbon dioxide is naturally recycled from the atmosphere into cellulose in plants and back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide when plants decompose, burning biomass-derived fuel such as alcohol in internal combustion engines has a zero net effect on the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. On the other hand, burning fossil fuels continually adds carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, to the atmosphere.


Well if they are fossil fuels from prior organic life does’nt the logic apply to that also? Most plants are co2 starved and are looking for that co2.


4 posted on 12/09/2007 8:28:16 PM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

boy - this is gonna piss off Putie and the Mussies.


6 posted on 12/09/2007 8:37:12 PM PST by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It’s bogus. We’ve been trying to find a viable gasification technology for 2 years. It’s simply not there. They may be able to make the fuel, but not profitably. Besides, you aren’t serious about gasification unless you can do 500 tons per day.


7 posted on 12/09/2007 9:58:55 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Friends don't let friends vote Huckabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"I want energy self sufficiency for the U.S. This technique has the extra benefit of being a method for garbage disposal."

This basically boils down to gasifying garbage and using the syngas to make fuel. The only difference here is that the end product is intended to be "mixed alcohols" rather than hydrocarbons.

I've long wondered why such an approach wasn't tried---any major city probably processes enough carbonaceous waste into its landfills in a single day to replace all the fuel it uses for that same day.

8 posted on 12/10/2007 5:00:58 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Beowulf

~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ™ ping~~


14 posted on 12/31/2007 10:45:58 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson