To: bill1952
Some people say that the Army’s Interceptor Body Armor (IBA) doesn’t really protect you well at all. I don’t have any first-hand observations to say if it does or doesn’t.
745 posted on
12/09/2007 4:33:49 PM PST by
tlj18
(Keep your eye on China, they are our #1 enemy....)
To: tlj18
What’s your point - other than to proselytize heresay and rumormongering - then?
752 posted on
12/09/2007 4:36:25 PM PST by
raygun
("It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence")
To: tlj18
Some people say that the Army’s Interceptor Body Armor (IBA) doesn’t really protect you well at all.Yeah the guy's from Dragon Skin, the heavier body armor that delams in hot storage.
753 posted on
12/09/2007 4:36:36 PM PST by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: tlj18
Some people say that the Army’s Interceptor Body Armor (IBA) doesn’t really protect you well at all. Not without the trauma plates. But with them it's good against at least 7.62x39. Without it, it's good for shrapnel. Most military "body armor" was designed against shrapnel, at least until recently.
923 posted on
12/09/2007 6:13:56 PM PST by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson