You're exaggerating. Normal stuff was forbidden and he wa searched for that, not what you've claimed. The discussion at xpentacostals had someone noting that even Care Bears could result in kids being possessed by them, according to the preachers.
He also mentioned that she didn't like some video games. What would those be? Hmmm... What kinds of video games did the Columbine killers favor? Educated guess time again.
So no, I don't feel I was exaggerating.
Disclosure time: I have a HS senior and a HS junior here at home with us.
Think about it, now. If "normal stuff" is forbidden, that would imply ALL video games and CDs and DVDs. Now, I can see it being possible to hide from Mom's view certain music CDs and certain video game CDs and certain movie DVDs, and only watching/listening/playing those banned items with the sound turned down low in your own room. But it's virtually impossible for a kid to hide for long a video game console, CD players, and DVD players. This implies that these pieces of electronics did exist in his home. This in turn implies that only items on the verboten list were banned in the home, and that music and video games and movies that the mother defined as "normal" were allowed.
For instance, I'll venture a wild guess that albums with lyrics like, "Satan lord, your throne among the flames of the abyss. Evil one, the mighty lord of hell... Satan" didn't make the cut in her home, into her "normal stuff" category.
Therefore, I am still awaiting a single example of this mother's alleged child abuse.
And no, I'm not a liberal or a libertarian. So quoting to me the atheists' currently favorite claim that "teaching any kind of religion to children is, in and of itself, child abuse" will not win me over.
Seriously, even if that's the case, it is not "severely damaging." I've gone through worse "damage" than that if that is damage. Non-starter.