The page says "related" like someone has directly related the medication to the event. No such thing happened of course.
You say that the drug companies have a huge profit that they're banking on. Which is true. But they have unlimited exposure in liability as well. If one of these cases was actually linked to the medication usage, there would be a windfall for everyone who'd taken an SSRI, SNRI or Tic Tac and subsequently yelled at their cat.
Secondly, the list was a lot shorter than I expected. If you compared that to a list of shootings, acts of violence, suicides by people who were diagnosed as depressed or bipolar or etc., who were not on medication I suspect the list would be much longer on the non-pharmocologically treated side. Which would kinda negate your point (though I doubt it would slow you down in the least).