So, what do you make of this?
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911
Is it a lowball? Does “recoverable” take technology advancement into account?
It depends on what they mean as "undiscovered".
Yes, I see it as a lowball estimate. When you think about it, for them to revise previous estimates upward by a factor of 25 is pretty much for any Governmental Agency.
Now it is up to us to prove the estimate is low.
Their statement was "recoverable using current technology", and that is evolving from well to well, so no, future advancements are not taken into account..