Dishonest Political Tampering with the Science on Global Warming

The HEARTLAND INSTITUTE ^ | December 5, 2007 | Christopher Monckton, Denpasar, Bali

[penowa]

This guy sounds like he listens to Rush Limbaugh. LOL!

Just happy to see someone else who passed 5th grade science class a long time ago and can still think.

[tenthirteen]

UN= Undeniable Nonsense

[two-edged-sword]

An Inconvenient Truth, which won this year’s Oscar for Best Sci-Fi Comedy Horror.

Boy that says it all!

[Rudder]

There’s a lot of influential people, institutions, governments and businesses who will not accept that climate change is not anthropogenic and not a crisis. Put simply, there’s too much money to change hands for these guys to give up the money-maker.

[Enchante]

For this these frauds win the friggin' Nobel Prize!!! OF course it's the "Peace" prize, so we have the absurd predicament of a committee of socialists from the Norwegian Parliament allowed to elevate such fraudulent "science" to a position of eminence even though the Norwegian socialsts do not know their a-holes from an undersea vent......

"At the very heart of the IPCC’s calculations lurks an error more serious than any of these. The IPCC says: “The CO2 radiative forcing increased by 20 percent during the last 10 years (1995-2005).” Radiative forcing quantifies increases in radiant energy in the atmosphere, and hence in temperature. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 in 1995 was 360 parts per million. In 2005 it was just 5percent higher, at 378 ppm. But each additional molecule of CO2 in the air causes a smaller radiant-energy increase than its predecessor. So the true increase in radiative forcing was 1 percent, not 20 percent. The IPCC has exaggerated the CO2 effect 20-fold. Why so large and crucial an exaggeration? Answer: the IPCC has repealed the fundamental physicalthe Stefan-Boltzmann equation - that converts radiant energy to temperature. Without this equation, no meaningful calculation of the effect of radiance on temperature can be done. Yet the 1,600 pages of the IPCC’s 2007 report do not mention it once."

[Erasmus]

Put simply, there’s too much money to change hands for these guys to give up the money-maker.

Or to put it slightly differently, it's naive to expect Algore and his buddies to just sit around on their moneymakers.

[CanaGuy]

Wow, not only is it “dishonest”, it’s despicable. Someone should be hung out to dry on this one.

[maine-iac7]

BUMP

[r-q-tek86]

ping

[randog]

An interesting wikipedia bio on Monckton:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Monckton,_3rd_Viscount_Monckton_of_Brenchley

[3IDVET]

Great article!!! About time the truth came out about this BS...So sick of hearing the doom and gloom on every channel, in every news paper..

[pankot]

The whole “Global” BS is just an excuse to permit the UN to tax America until it capitulates. Does anyone else see this?

[Thickman]

Good link in support of the thread. He is a very interesting man.

[pepsionice]

The amazing thing...is that there are NO public forums where these facts are discussed. None of the global warming crowd will meet on any NPR program with this crowd to discuss the entire agenda. You won’t have any major university have a simple one-on-one discussion. Its almost like the Catholic church in a way...the Pope won’t dare come out of the Vatican to face some Baptist minister to discuss virtues or values. So when they make the comparison of the environmental movement to some religion...they are mostly correct.

[stormer]

Sorry Lord Monckton, I couldn’t get past this...

“...through our hereditary element the most independent-minded of lawmakers...”

LOL - White Courtesy Phone; a Mr Thomas Jefferson wishes to speak with you.

[ricks_place]

I was with you until the unnecessary and non-germain snipe at the Catholic Church. Christians of different denominations have many ecumenical meeting. Christian churches are run by humans, naturally sinful with greed, lust, and so forth. Wait for heaven, if you want perfection!

[ricks_place]

A life appointment allows “the most independent-minded of lawmakers”. For good or ill, there is no public election or re-election. Mr Thomas Jefferson could be turned out of office and cease to be a law maker; a peer faces no such obstacle to independence.

[3IDVET]

Totaly agree

[Publius6961]

BUMP!