Skip to comments.
Ask candidates why military guns OK'd for public, advocate urges (Barf Alert)
The Altoona Herald ^
| December 7, 2007
| Tony Leys and Jason Clayworth
Posted on 12/07/2007 6:03:10 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Typical!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"...assault weapons"
like a frying pan, baseball bat, fists, pencil, car, etc.?
2
posted on
12/07/2007 6:05:07 PM PST
by
robomatik
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Typical bed-wetting lib, with the mentality of a 6 year old.
3
posted on
12/07/2007 6:10:01 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Simple. The constitutution doesn’t specify type of arms.
4
posted on
12/07/2007 6:13:28 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“described as an AK-47-**style** assault rifle,”
Is this like banning pistol grips on rifles because they supposedly allow criminals to spray a room with bullets like in a Hollywood movie?
Ask anti-gun nuts why they don’t know anything about guns.
Also, “assault rifle” as used in the USA today is an invented term.
5
posted on
12/07/2007 6:14:50 PM PST
by
Aglooka
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I went to high school with Paul Helmke. He is an ass.
Steve Zweig
North Side HS ‘67
6
posted on
12/07/2007 6:14:51 PM PST
by
szweig
(Had it up to here)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Semi-automatics are NOT military weapons. Stupid liberals can't seem to differentiate between a semi and and automatic. The latter has been banned in the civilian market in this country since 1934.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
7
posted on
12/07/2007 6:15:22 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Aglooka
Ask anti-gun nuts why they dont know anything about guns.
A while back I saw a newsbimbo say "Semi automatic weapons can't be used for hunting" as if it were fact.
8
posted on
12/07/2007 6:17:16 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Republican Rudy Giuliani's campaign declined to specifically answer the question"LOL! Same old Julieannie.
9
posted on
12/07/2007 6:18:10 PM PST
by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: goldstategop
only production thereof i believe. you can still get an fbi class 3 tag if your record is clean.
To: goldstategop
“Semi-automatics are NOT military weapons. Stupid liberals can’t seem to differentiate between a semi and and automatic. The latter has been banned in the civilian market in this country since 1934. “
Libs know. Propagandists such as helmke use this misinformation to further their goal of banning all guns. Advocacy groups such as this openly admit that they want and intend to do to the US what was done to the UK.
Hand them in Mr and Mrs America
11
posted on
12/07/2007 6:21:29 PM PST
by
Aglooka
To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; ntnychik; Travis McGee; 2ndDivisionVet
.
Obviously a 12 gauge pump would not have been dangerous at all
12
posted on
12/07/2007 6:22:00 PM PST
by
devolve
(---- - Hey Boone! - My bonus check is late again! -)
To: cripplecreek
The second amendment isn't about hunting, anyway.
13
posted on
12/07/2007 6:25:53 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Same crap as here in Virgina after Va, Tech. But not one word about tightening up on the whack jobs that let mental cases run the streets.
How come the punk cop gunning down six with his m16 did not get the same type of attention.
14
posted on
12/07/2007 6:26:03 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Travis McGee
I suspect that a person in that mall that had the right to carry a gun could have ended that shooting spree after one or two shots were fired.
15
posted on
12/07/2007 6:30:26 PM PST
by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here we go... Prices will rise some more as the run-up on more gun purchases increases and continues with these liberal whack-jobs threatening another ban.
16
posted on
12/07/2007 6:33:04 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: org.whodat
“Same crap as here in Virgina after Va, Tech. But not one word about tightening up on the whack jobs that let mental cases run the streets.”
And still no mention of the mall being a “gun free zone” (for law abiding citizens)in a state that allows it’s citizens to cary concealed weapons. Had there been even one capable armed private citizen within range of this animal the story would have a happy ending.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Democrat Bill Richardson and Republicans Mike Huckabee, John McCain, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, Tom Tancredo and Fred Thompson said they would not support reinstating the ban.”
Mitt Romney caught in another lie!
Check the transcript of the 2nd debate. Romney clearly states he supports an AWB!
18
posted on
12/07/2007 6:34:15 PM PST
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Civilians have ALWAYS in the past had beter firearms than the Military.
In the 1700’s, the military used the smooth bore flintlock musket. Civilians used super accurate flintlock rifles.
When the miitary adopted a flintlock rifle the civilians were using percussion cap rifles that didn’t misfire.
When the military adopted a percussion cap rifle civilians were already using breech loading cartridge rifles.
During the Civil War the military used anything that would shoot but afterward they adopted a single shot breechloading cartridge rifle. Civilians were using rapid fire lever action rifles, pumps, bolt actions and were experimenting with self-loading rifles and machineguns.
Wehn the military adopted a really good bolt action rifle many civilians were already using European versions as their hunting rifle.
When the military adopted a really good self loading rifle many civilians clammered for one also, even though they had better bolt actions.
When the military adopted the m-14 and later the m-16 they r then surpassed civilians in what they could own.
Civilians had to settle with semi-auto versions and in some retarded states even those were banned.
In all that time the Military and police NEVER claimed to be “outgunned” till the last few years.
I always remember Harry Tracy who piled up dead lawmen like cordwood with only a 30-30 Winchester and a Colt single action pistol.
19
posted on
12/07/2007 6:34:18 PM PST
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Only infidel blood can quench Muslim thirst-- Abdul-Jalil Nazeer al-Karouri)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Robert Hawkins reportedly used in Wednesday's shootings in Omaha would have been illegal to purchase under the assault-weapons ban.
yeah and I bet that would have stopped the mentally ill guy who was hell bent on KILLING...he probably would have said: "wow there's a ban on this weapon, I better not use it". I mean if there had been a law he wouldn't have broke it.(he probably didn't know that killing people is against the law or that the mall was a gun free zone) sure.
20
posted on
12/07/2007 6:34:52 PM PST
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson