Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
F-18 has issues of its own. Turns out, the jet only has 1/2 the fatigue life that the Navy thought it did.

Yeah but Navy fatigue is different, no? Carrier landings have a heckuva lot more shock & salt air creates more corrosion problems. I would think land-based F-18's would have much longer lifespans. Plus I think we'd be talking about F18-E/F models which are essentially a different aircraft from the F/A-18 A thru C.

19 posted on 12/07/2007 4:37:20 PM PST by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

It depends. Yes, the load conditions are different for the landing gear and arresting hook for land vs. carrier landings. But pulling 9g in a dogfight is no different for carrier or land-based jets, those cycles add up no matter where you’re landing.


20 posted on 12/07/2007 5:33:03 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Oh, the huge manatee!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson