Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

OK. I think the speech was to give evangelicals a reason to support him, not to club them over the head for not doing so.

The fact that James Dobson didn’t see an attack on evangelicals in the speech tells me that at least it wasn’t an obvious one. Dobson is known to be pretty in tune with that sort of thing, to a fault according to some members here :-)

Given that the media and the democrats are truly attacking evangelicals (just look at the questions about “creation” and the smirks about the answers to that and the “is the bible true” question), I think we should focus on the real attacks, not perceived ones.


303 posted on 12/07/2007 1:11:10 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
The fact that James Dobson didn’t see an attack on evangelicals in the speech tells me that at least it wasn’t an obvious one. Dobson is known to be pretty in tune with that sort of thing, to a fault according to some members here :-)

Dobson is losing credibility with me by the day. His obvious fawning over Gingrich was the first sign that he has taken his "position" too seriously, and it's just gone downhill from there.

308 posted on 12/07/2007 1:18:01 PM PST by kevkrom ("Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?" - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson