To: Earthdweller
It’s just so knee-jerk, you know? I mean, NO ONE has come up with a way for Israel to get along with her neighbors, but Bush tried ONCE AGAIN to bring the players together to at least get them to talk. They didn’t. The anti-Semites did their usual thing. And BUSH is the one who gets smeared for it?
8 posted on
12/07/2007 1:41:20 AM PST by
Darkwolf377
(...sigh...)
To: Darkwolf377
The author has some strong convictions, but I think the main thesis is that the US is not just failing to support Israel. It is now actively trying to impede Israel. One example would be the recent launch halting of their surveillance satellite. Another example would be trying to temper Israels response to that massive round of Hezbollha Rocket attacks. Another example would be holding up their recent attack on the Syrian facility. Those three examples just happened in the last year or so. Something drastic has recently changed in US foreign policy. We can see it with respect to North Korea and Iran. Granted one could blame this sudden change on the loss of the US Congress and US Senate to the dimwits, but some of us are worrying that there may be more to it then just that.
Perhaps we should all expect more unilateral actions by Israel, Taiwan and Japan in the future. Israel already has hundreds of very powerful nukes. Japan could have that many rather quickly.
To: Darkwolf377
but Bush tried ONCE AGAIN to bring the players together to at least get them to talk. Bush couldn't give two sh*ts about substantive "peace". He is in "legacy mode", which for the last 3 Administrations has meant one thing: F*ck the Jews. 15 of 19 9/11 mass-murderers were Saudi? No problem, we won't hold them accountable. Palestinian men, women and children danced in the streets as the WTC fell, burying 3,000 in the rubble? No problem, let's reward them with a "state". It is all utter madness. All because of oil.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson