Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Racism at Annapolis

The Washington Post is the only major newspaper that reported on this disturbing exchange at Annapolis last week. During a closed-door session among foreign ministers and diplomats the day after the summit, Israel’s Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni reportedly asked the Arabs attending the conference, “Why doesn’t anyone want to shake my hand? Why doesn’t anyone want to be seen speaking to me?” The Post quoted a Dutch diplomat who heard the remarks as saying, “They shun her like she is Count Dracula’s younger sister.”

On Friday, Caroline Glick wrote in her column for the Jerusalem Post,

This week the Bush administration legitimized Arab anti-Semitism. In an effort to please the Saudis and their Arab brothers, the Bush administration agreed to physically separate the Jews from the Arabs at the Annapolis conference in a manner that aligns with the apartheid policies of the Arab world which prohibit Israelis from setting foot on Arab soil.

Evident everywhere, the discrimination against Israel received its starkest expression at the main assembly of the Annapolis conference on Tuesday. There, in accordance with Saudi demands, the Americans prohibited Israeli representatives from entering the hall through the same door as the Arabs.

… It is true that Israel has security concerns, but as far as Rice is concerned, the Palestinians are the innocent victims. They are the ones who are discriminated against and humiliated, not Livni, who was forced—by Rice—to enter the conference through the service entrance.

One wonders if this development might have received more widespread coverage had the Arabs been made to enter the hall through the service entrance—or if Secretary Rice had.

===================================

The recent Annapolis Conference is a case in point. I asked a very knowledgeable friend in Israel if the Hebrew Media actually reported what went on. When I mentioned a few incidents known in America, I was told that, either it was not mentioned in Israel’s Hebrew Media or, if it was, it was positioned in a few lines of commentary and in language stilted to trivialize the event.

For example, the Saudi King Faisal stated plainly that he would NOT shake the hand of the Israeli Prime Minister or Foreign Minister. (That was the position of Hafez al Assad (former President of Syria) wherein he too stated that he would rather cut off his hand than shake the hand of Jews.) During the opening ceremonies the Saudi King stated that he would not go through the same main entrance, IF the Jewish delegation also was allowed to enter through that main passage. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accommodated the Saudis by having the Israelis enter through a service door, otherwise used by servants.

To the shame of Olmert, he accepted the Rice-Saudi insult and entered as a servant or known in Arabic as a "Dhimmi" or lowly person. This was NOT reported in the Hebrew Media.

In a news editorial in the prestigious Wall St. Journal (1), an editorial was printed entitled "The Saudis New PR Man" by Dan Senor, a well known foreign policy advisor to the Bush Administration. (He is no longer in that position.) We are informed by Senor that Olmert lobbied presidential candidates and members of Congress that their skepticism about the possibility of Annapolis succeeding was misplaced. (He became the "pitchman" for Rice, Bush, the Saudis and thus, the title of "The Saudis’ New PR Man". We are further informed by Senor that the Israeli Press Corps was kicked outside during a press event wherein, under Rice Protocol, the Arab League foreign ministers were to be interviewed by the Press Corps which presumably included all the American and European Media. The Israeli Press Corps were made to stand outside in the rain to cover the story as best they could. Although, no doubt, the Israeli journalist reported this grossly unpardonable insult, the Hebrew Media in Israel chose not to inform the Israeli public.

21 posted on 12/07/2007 7:23:19 AM PST by SJackson (we're gonna change the rules and have voting only on the Internet, then we're gonna win!, Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
The Israeli Press Corps were made to stand outside in the rain to cover the story as best they could. Although, no doubt, the Israeli journalist reported this grossly unpardonable insult, the Hebrew Media in Israel chose not to inform the Israeli public.

When the Israeli Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister are escorted to use the service entry to the building AND they willingly do so, there are serious issues at hand. Welcome to the New World Order. Men and nations lay down to die. The leaders in Israel are saying, "It is time for us to lay down." If the Jewish people agree, so be it. If they don't then they had better make some changes, and do it fast.

23 posted on 12/07/2007 8:55:41 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
There are a lot of excellent points made on this thread on both sides of the issue.

As pointed out in post 14 and others, the administration has been strongly supportive of Israel but now is moving toward pressuring Israel for more concessions while not demanding the same of the muslims.

To me this has the stink of the classic mad dash for a presidential mideast legacy ala Bill Clinton and Mad Maddy Albright.

Whatever your feelings about the article consider this observation:

"Submitting to Saudi demands, the Americans prohibited Israeli representatives from entering the hall through the same door as the Arabs."

"It is unfathomable to consider this with any other race, creed or color. Imagine separate entrances for the leader of an African nation because a "white" leader refused to walk through the same door as the black man, because it would be unclean?"

This is not how great nations treat their friends.
Israelis did not murder 3,000 Americans, but Saudi Arabians did.
Why does the administration make concessions to the Saudi Arabians while treating Israelis as lepers?

This administration owes the Israeli people an apology.

27 posted on 12/07/2007 11:10:32 AM PST by Iron Munro ( (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
but as far as Rice is concerned, the Palestinians are the innocent victims. They are the ones who are discriminated against and humiliated, not Livni, who was forced—by Rice—to enter the conference through the service entrance.

For the first time since Bush was elected I'm almost ashamed to say that I voted for him. Rice should be fired first thing tomorrow morning if she is responsible for this disgraceful treatment of one of our very few real friends in the entire world. IMHO she should be fired anyway, she has shown over and over that she has no expertise at conducting foreign policy in our own best interests, and her public fawning over murderous Arab leaders is disgusting.

I don't know what has gone haywire with Bush in this 2nd term, at times he hardly seems like the same man he was early in his first term. It seems that he has never met a bloodthirsty Arab or an illegal Mexican immigrant who he didn't fall in love with on sight. If I knew for sure that a true conservative Republican would win in 08 I would be anxiously waiting for Bush's term to end and be done with him once and for all.

43 posted on 12/08/2007 7:41:49 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson