Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy chaplain pleads to forcible sodomy
United Press International ^ | 06DEC07 | United Press International

Posted on 12/06/2007 6:41:26 PM PST by familyop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: acapesket

Sounds like you don’t know about the teachings of Saint Francis de Sales or much of anything about your “faith” for that matter.


21 posted on 12/06/2007 7:15:27 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
That’s what the Drive-bys don’t want people to know: they’re homosexuals.

My sarcastic point exactly.

22 posted on 12/06/2007 7:19:49 PM PST by Jeff Chandler ("Liberals want to save the world for the children they aren't having." -Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Someone better look into the prosecutor who apparently offered up this gift plea bargain. Was there a guilty verdict and THEN a plea deal? Can’t understand this one.


23 posted on 12/06/2007 7:28:02 PM PST by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

I hear you. The house cleaning has not been thorough enough yet.


24 posted on 12/06/2007 7:35:37 PM PST by bajabaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: acapesket
"Terrific!

Just when I am conflicted about re-joining my faith again.
"

...Catholicism in particular or Christianity in general? Even Orthodox rabbis (at least some) say that Christians are "closer" than Atheists.
25 posted on 12/06/2007 7:37:56 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
I forgot, is sodomy Monica Lewinsky or Barney Frank?

All of the above. The Georgia statute defined sodomy as "a sexual act involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another." I believe most state laws had a similar definition.

Laws against consensual sodomy were struck down in 2004, and were seldom enforced before then. The laws against forcible sodomy, or aggravated sodomy as it's called in many jurisdictions, still stand. The difference between consensual and forcible sodomy is like the difference between fornication and rape.

26 posted on 12/06/2007 7:43:13 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: babygene
"The only thing to do with a person like this is to execute them. If you leave them out of prison, they will attack the public, if you put them in prison, they will attack the prisoners.

It’s a shame, but the only answer seems to be extermination.
"

Yes. Sodomy is wrong anywhere, IMO. It is my belief that when the time comes, such things will be illegal again and will cease. Our "justice" system has legalized quite a few ancient attacks against the family then made beside-the-point laws disguised as family laws.
27 posted on 12/06/2007 7:54:35 PM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Lee, a Roman Catholic priest, admitted forcing himself on a gay Naval Academy midshipman

Also known as HOMOSEXUAL RAPE.

Right?

28 posted on 12/06/2007 8:05:07 PM PST by Lizavetta ( Politicians: When they're speaking, they're lying - when they're not speaking, they're stealing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Homos do not produce they recruit


29 posted on 12/06/2007 8:18:25 PM PST by M1D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: familyop

IMHO, they could bring back burning at the stake for this pervert.I’m sure he would feel right at home in the fire.


30 posted on 12/06/2007 9:14:19 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Lee, a Roman Catholic priest, admitted...(snip)...
to having sex with an Air Force officer without disclosing
he was HIV-positive.


I wouldn't be suprised if this was heard in Lee's interogation:
"I was just following military policy: the Air Force officer
didn't ask if I was HIV-positive, and I didn't tell him I was."
31 posted on 12/06/2007 9:24:09 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Oh, yeah. Letting homosexuals into the military is a terrific idea! /sarc


32 posted on 12/06/2007 9:27:26 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
I used to be a big defender of my church until the principal of my old catholic high school took a bunch of students during break to Ft. Bragg to protest the School of the Americas.

Now I think the church needs to mind its own house before casting stones....

33 posted on 12/06/2007 10:27:14 PM PST by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

No comment from Hillary’s gay general that masqueraded as an “uncommitted Republican” at the CNN Debate...


34 posted on 12/06/2007 11:25:02 PM PST by Tall_Texan (No Third Term For Bill Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Can always count on folks on these Catholic threads to be judgemental as opposed to encouraging in their Christianity. One of the many reasons I am conflicted. It’s all about absolutes.


35 posted on 12/07/2007 5:24:12 AM PST by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Jim Robinson; scripter; EdReform; LiteKeeper

The most crucial issue in allowing homosexuals into the military is at the intersection of morale and infection.

The walking blood supply is that blood you get from the buddy in your unit when the bagged supply is unavailable or runs out of your type.

If your buddy is gay, do you want his? If you’re wounded, do you want him working on you? If he’s wounded, do you want to work on him?

They say, “but don’t you screen for Hiv?” Sure. Once every 2 years or so, but even if they did it the week before deployment, gays are notoriously promiscuous and find a way to connect with someone or something somewhere. So far as HIV is concerned, it is virulent and transmissible within a few short weeks. So, screen today, clean today, but dirty in 2 weeks.

And we haven’t mentioned that there’s no screening for other blood-bourne pathogens such as hepatitis, a disease that is also epidemic in the gay community.

So, if you can save his life with your blood, and he can’t save yours with his, what effect will that have on morale?

And if every application of first aid with a bleeding wound is something terrifying, what effect will that have on morale?

The gay general at the Republican so-called debate was a shill for those who don’t care if they kill people.


36 posted on 12/20/2007 3:29:11 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson