Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreenAccord
Teams outside the 16 could still participate in the current smaller bowls. Typically, only the fans of those teams watch the games or travel to them so the pay-off shouldn't be any less.

Some of the money from the play-off could be distributed to non-participating teams in a profit sharing scenario.

5 posted on 12/06/2007 5:54:47 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: FreeAtlanta

That’s what I keep saying. And because there would be more games played that actually mean something the revenue would be sky high. Everyone involved would make more money than they ever dreamed of under the old non-system.


6 posted on 12/06/2007 5:57:46 PM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: FreeAtlanta

“Some of the money from the play-off could be distributed to non-participating teams in a profit sharing scenario.”

That ‘profit sharing’ is exactly why this won’t work. By the time the NCAA ‘shares’ the profits, the schools in the playoffs lose money.


9 posted on 12/06/2007 6:05:42 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson