Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Air National Guard to trial Beechcraft AT-6 for counter-insurgency
Flight International ^ | 06/12/07 | Stephen Trimble

Posted on 12/06/2007 11:16:57 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

US Air National Guard to trial Beechcraft AT-6 for counter-insurgency

By Stephen Trimble

The US Air National Guard has received special funds to stage a demonstration of the turboprop-powered Hawker Beechcraft AT-6 for the domestic security and counter-insurgency mission.

Kansas-based Senator Sam Brownback earmarked $3 million for the ANG to demonstrate the capabilities of the AT-6, which is assembled in Wichita, Kansas.

The AT-6 is among at least four contenders to fill an emerging role in US and foreign airborne inventories for a dedicated counter-insurgency aircraft. The US Air Force is conducting a competition for such an aircraft on behalf of the Iraqi air force, with contenders including the AT-6, Embraer's EMB-314 Super Tucano, Korea Aerospace Industries' KA-1 and the Pilatus PC-9. Ohio-based US Aircraft is also seeking to offer the developmental A-67, but is not expected to be ready in time for the Iraqi contract.

Meanwhile, the ANG's rising interest in the COIN mission comes as the USAF continues to debate the need to acquire a turboprop-powered combat fleet in a time of tightening acquisition budgets. The US Special Operations Command released a White Paper in mid-2007 calling for a new Irregular Warfare wing comprised of one squadron of turboprops with a light strike capability.

Meanwhile, the National Guard Association of the United States adopted a resolution in August that urges Congress to set aside funding for the turboprop-powered fleet dedicated to the COIN mission.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; ang; beechcraft; coin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
1 posted on 12/06/2007 11:16:59 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Dust off the Skyraider?


2 posted on 12/06/2007 11:21:01 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I kinda liked the Argie Pucara, myself.


3 posted on 12/06/2007 11:21:48 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The Super Tucano is a nice aircraft with a proven record. But the AT-6 looks good, too. It will be an interesting competition.

We should have these ourselves, too, of course. For a lot of missions, greater speed is not an asset, particularly when going Air-to-Mud.

Of course, we should have diesel/electric submarines, as well. Try to talk the Navy into that...


4 posted on 12/06/2007 11:24:10 AM PST by gridlock (Hillary is America's Ex-Spouse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

According to Wiki, less than a year ago, the administration scotched a sale of 36 EMB-314 Super Tucanos to Hugo (it has an american engine).


5 posted on 12/06/2007 11:24:52 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
You know the Skyraider actually was in the AF inventory until the 80’s. Dusting those off or even upgrading them would make sense. Actually, it makes too much sense so it will never happen.
6 posted on 12/06/2007 11:25:01 AM PST by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

my dream was the old P-47 or Corsair


7 posted on 12/06/2007 11:26:39 AM PST by GreyFriar ( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
I was thinking of the Mustang myself, cheap to build, maintain, and if you mounted a couple of hellfires on the wings it would still be a deadly aircraft even today.
8 posted on 12/06/2007 11:31:56 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Surly they cannot be talking about the A-T6 Texan, the terror of the Cadets?? They were great to fly, and could be very forgiving if you let it. Heaven Have Mercy. Must be a new version/
9 posted on 12/06/2007 11:32:09 AM PST by BooBoo1000 (Some times I wake up grumpy, other times I let her sleep/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

Production of the Skyraider ended in 1957 and all in U.S. inventory were handed over to the South Vietnamese (VNAF) in November of 1972. Replaced by the A-37 Dragonfly.


10 posted on 12/06/2007 11:34:01 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BooBoo1000

No, this is by Beechcraft. A narrow crankwing aircraft with big double canopy and narrow empenage. sort of ugly looking.


11 posted on 12/06/2007 11:36:02 AM PST by GreyFriar ( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Mustang’s were good, but being liquid cooled it is/was easy to fatally damage the engine by taking out the cooling system, just like the old Spitfire.


12 posted on 12/06/2007 11:37:56 AM PST by GreyFriar ( 3rd Armored Division - Spearhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
No, this is by Beechcraft. A narrow crankwing aircraft with big double canopy and narrow empenage. sort of ugly looking.,/I>

The A-10 is sort of ugly looking also, but it turned out to be a great plane for close air support.

13 posted on 12/06/2007 11:40:40 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

True, but now we would use an aluminum block. Add some ribbing on there and then allow for the pilot to blow the cowling off, I bet I could design an engine easy that would still make it home with a lost coolant system if I was to design it for that situation.


14 posted on 12/06/2007 11:42:11 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Mustang’s were good, but being liquid cooled it is/was easy to fatally damage the engine by taking out the cooling system, just like the old Spitfire.

It would need to be re-engined as a turboprop.

15 posted on 12/06/2007 11:42:29 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I sat in an AT-34 in Argentina. It had rocket pods and guns, but its still hard to feel mean in a Turbo-wheenie, even with the uprated hot section.

The AT-6 has a bit more hoopla though.


16 posted on 12/06/2007 11:46:03 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people. Socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I was thinking of the Mustang myself, cheap to build, maintain, and if you mounted a couple of hellfires on the wings it would still be a deadly aircraft even today.

Not a great ground-attack aircraft given its cooling plumbing.

Sadly the AF had retired all of its P-47s before Korea. The Jug would have brought back a lot more pilots. If you look at the late model Ms and Ns you'll find they were 470mph with the same range as the Mustang.

17 posted on 12/06/2007 11:48:53 AM PST by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people. Socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Oh yeah, Marine pilots flew them in Korea with dive brakes extended, 15 feet off the ground. What the .50 calibers didn’t get, the prop did. Lots of them crashed due to mud-caked windshields or telephone wire fouling the control surfaces.

A most versatile aircraft; I’m sure that some could be put back in service at a fraction of today’s aircraft. Finding pilots crazy enough to fly them might be a problem.


18 posted on 12/06/2007 11:55:50 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1 - Take no prisoners))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

The Corsair and the Skyraider often flew together from carriers during Korea.

The lack of aerial refuling during Korea hampered the “Sandy” role unfortunately (re: the last scene of “The Bridges at Toko-ri” when the Skyraiders have to depart and William Holden and Mickey Rooney are then killed by the baddies).


19 posted on 12/06/2007 12:07:30 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar; Abathar; PAR35; SampleMan

That fact keeps cropping up. I read far more Mustang pilots were lost to this fact than to enemy fighters.

After a “hit in the glycol” as the brits put it, the Merlin would seize almost instantaneously and the pilot would be left hurtling along with no time to look for a landing spot and far too low to bail out.

In contrast, the P-47 could lose a few cylinders and the P-38 had two engines.


20 posted on 12/06/2007 12:12:27 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson