Right, because Merck (which is still trying to figure out how much they are going to lose over the Vioxx fiasco) couldn't possible have an agenda when they suggest that EVERY female over the age of eleven be given their drug.
That’s a completely seperate issue that has nothing to do with the premise of the article.
Nobody is saying Merck doesn’t have an agenda. It just has nothing to do with this article. I don’t support a government mandate for this vaccine, but that doesn’t change the fact that this article is incoherent nonsense that makes Algore sound like a competent climate scientist.
Thats sort of the point with vaccines. They don’t work once you have the disease. You have to take it when you are healthy. Wide spread vaccinations practically eliminated some diseases, but the people too lazy or too paranoid to get vaccinated have provided hosts for some of these diseases to hang around and in some cases make a comeback. It’s too bad.