They may be “one” in the eyes of the law for marital property reasons but only Bill Clinton was actually sworn in as the Commander in Chief.
The guy is trying to change the definition of “one” in order to prevent Hillary from being a valid candidate. Not even God looks at us like this. In marriage husband and wife are also “one”, but God does will not judge the husband for the wife’s sins, nor the wife’s, to the husband. And even though husband and wife are “one”, they have equal yet distinct roles only they can fill. Just because you are “one” doesn’t mean if “one” of you holds an office with a term limit, the other spouse who wasn’t elected to that office, by being married to the officeholder, is disqualified from runnning for that office later.
It is wishful thinking at best. I say let Hillary be the candidate. She is such a high negative candidate, and has such a low charisma, she will not win. As the stress on her increases, she will only get meaner, and more shrill, and defensive, and shouting. And that will just turn off people even more.
Co-presidency was the Clintons’ own term and even during the 1992 race, they said it was a two for one deal, you KNEW as a voter you were getting both co-presidents in the White House.
We are supposed to forget that unconstitutional crap they pulled. Let them hang themselves by their own rope.
The amendment says only that you had to be acting a president for 2 years. It specifically AVOIDS saying that you had to BE the President.