Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A.A. Cunningham

Not quite, although the designs are from the same era. From the RAF’s homepage on the aircraft:

“The Nimrod MR1 entered service in 1969 and was upgraded to MR2 standard in the late 1970s.”

That’s assuming that the original Nimrods were purpose-built airframes using part of the old Comet 4’s design (mainly the wing), and not rebuilt Comet 4 or 4A airliners. If they are, then they ARE as old as the B-52s.

}:-)4


8 posted on 12/05/2007 5:11:31 AM PST by Moose4 (Wasting away again in Michaelnifongville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Moose4; A.A. Cunningham; 6SJ7
That’s assuming that the original Nimrods were purpose-built airframes using part of the old Comet 4’s design (mainly the wing), and not rebuilt Comet 4 or 4A airliners.

That's correct. Only the wings were Comet-derived. The fuselage was entirely new. The problems with the original Comet 1 were to do with metal fatigue failure in the pressurused cabin, so irrelevant to the Nimrod (which, BTW, has been a superb aircraft for its purpose, especially low-speed loitering etc).

14 posted on 12/05/2007 6:21:57 AM PST by Winniesboy (Caution: Occam's razor carelessly applied can cut your own throat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moose4
If they are

That's a big if and assumption you are making. 1969-1962 = 7

20 posted on 12/05/2007 6:48:31 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson