Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50

In regards to the use of Churchill, one must admit that the Simovic coup was a total disaster for Serbs and that Prince Paul and Stojadinovic were right. Had there been no coup, there would have been no NDH, no Ustashi, no Skanderbeg, no Handzar SS, and Tito’s Partisans would have been easily dealt with since their main source of support wouldn’t have existed without the excesses of the NDH regime.


21 posted on 12/05/2007 10:24:14 PM PST by Diocletian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Diocletian
Had there been no coup, there would have been no NDH, no Ustashi,...

Dio: Please try not to use double negatives in your argunents, thanks.

23 posted on 12/06/2007 1:26:31 AM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic (III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Diocletian
In regards to the use of Churchill, one must admit that the Simovic coup was a total disaster for Serbs and that Prince Paul and Stojadinovic were right. Had there been no coup, there would have been no NDH, no Ustashi, no Skanderbeg, no Handzar SS, and Tito’s Partisans would have been easily dealt with since their main source of support wouldn’t have existed without the excesses of the NDH regime

And if the Serbs converted to Islam in the 15th century, they would have suffered none of the suffering Islam brought to them. Prince Paul and Stoyadinovich would have made Serbs collaborators of Nazi Germany (and probably the best friend of the US 50 years later!), but in retrospect the Serbs made a morally correct decision. That's more than can be said for the contemporary Serbs.

25 posted on 12/06/2007 5:48:46 AM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson