Nice.
Why is Guantanamo a litmus test for idiocy? The new distinctions that Guantanamo represent must suffer the examination and critisim that all new distinctions should suffer. The nation and our ideology have and will continue to pay a price for Guantanamo and while I think it has been worth it, I don't think it has been so "worth it" that we should not constantly assess whether it worth it to continue.
“Why is Guantanamo a litmus test for idiocy? The new distinctions that Guantanamo represent must suffer the examination and critisim that all new distinctions should suffer. The nation and our ideology have and will continue to pay a price for Guantanamo and while I think it has been worth it, I don’t think it has been so “worth it” that we should not constantly assess whether it worth it to continue.”
Huh, Are you fer it or against it?!? Speak English, man.
This is the same foolish, soft-headed mindset that led Huckabee to personally and passionately push for the parole of Wayne Dumond, the rapist who went on to rape and murder more women.
I have no idea what you are saying but if Huckabee is against waterboarding terrorist that could stop another 9/11 I'm against him.
I kind of liked I think it was Romney who said he would build more Guantanamos.
Because Huckleberry Hound was NOT discussing Guantanamo in a logical WOT American perspective, that’s why. Our military and leaders can discuss many aspects of Gitmo. Huck actually said we should reconsider it ON THE BASIS OF WHAT OTHER COUNTRIES THINK. A la Kerry, le choix francais.