Replies

Maybe he's inadvertently softening up the "soft" Republicans and conservative leaning independents for a run by Bloomberg or some other nanny state politican.

That wouldn't make a whole lot of sense, since Ron Paul is the furthest thing from a nanny state politician possible.

Theres no question Paul's being propped up financially by Soros / Move on . org sympathisers, et al. There probably a reason for that.

Who says there's no question? I myself have donated, as have many others I know, without reimbursement from Soros or anyone else. That baseless rumor has been floating around to try and smear Dr. Paul, but the fact is he has received many small donations from a large group of people. How exactly could Soros have anything to do with that?

he has received many small donations from a large group of people

Mostly because of his surrender stand on the War. Are you denying that? Read the sympathetic posts on the lefty blog sites and check out the comments on his website and elsewhere. Soros directly subsidizes Move on. Org and Daily Kos and they got plenty of money, as do their "supporters".

You are deluded if you think its because he's for lower taxes or abolishing the Dept of Commerce.. And, BTW, Buchanan was at least 150 dgrees away from Perot but both signified disaffection with the reigning "Bush" , and the first clearly led the way to the second, IMO.. You're just a dupe if you can't see that possibility.