To: cripplecreek
bet the judge told the jury they may only consider "the facts of the case" and that they cannot let their conscience,opinion of the law,or the motives of the defendants affect their decision...
fullyinformedjuries
179 posted on
12/05/2007 1:42:54 PM PST by
WOBBLY BOB
(there's a reason it's called the Clinton News Network)
To: WOBBLY BOB
People have no clue how destructive that single 1895 (?) supreme court ruling was. If jurors were informed of their rights there would be no OJ trial today and John Couey would have been erased within months instead of years.
180 posted on
12/05/2007 1:51:13 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson