I suspect his stance is already about as wide as it can get...
Posted on 12/03/2007 10:49:57 AM PST by jdm
That’s true, which makes it even more mystifying that the MSM doesn’t just leave the issue alone.
More bad news for Larry Widestance. Call Barney. Call Bill. Call Ted. It’s only sex. Blah, Blah...
This is one case where I don’t WANT the MSM to leave him alone. He’s a disgusting traitor to our party by staying in office when he KNOWS he can only do us harm. Selfish SOB. I hope he rots in shame. Whatever the MSM can do to drive him from office is fine with me. And the only reason they’re willing to do it, is because they rightfully suspect that this creep is going to hang in there and continue to drag us all down with him. He’s a scumbag. Every bit as low a scumbag as any of the scumbags on the other side of the aisle.
And I’ll prove it to you: He SAID he would resign if his plea couldn’t be changed and then he took it back. Lying faggot scumbag.
Craig is not homosexual but he is buysexual.
And the point of all this “outing” is...?
Isn’t Craig entitled to be “hypocritical” about such a matter?
Should we likewise demand that alcoholic (or social drinking) legislators oppose limits on alcohol consumption and drunk driving?
Every one has his own particular weakness or pitfall; that shouldn’t undermine his desire that society as a whole inhibit depraved sexuality.
No he is the jerko that should resign and let the Governor replace him with a real conservative that could then run as an incumbent, but that skank is too selfish.
How can one person “confirm” something in a he said he said my word versus theirs case? It just seems to me that the Democratic Party/Media are just trying to get Senator Craig’s seat.
Once again, I ask, where are the Democrat scandals of this type? Of course, if you are a Democrat, “it’s no big deal”.
As much as I don’t like hypocrisy, I don’t like Democrats even more.
I certainly don't. And, I find it odd that ABC is obsessed with this garbage.
Yeah... And, considering the source, you would at least have expected the headline to be written as:
Craig's List Is Lengthening (Not That There's Anything Wrong With That)
“He also renewed his intention to serve out the rest of his term. “I will not let this paper’s attempt to malign my name stop me from continuing my work to serve the people of Idaho.”
Translation: “He also renewed his intention to serve out the rest of his term. “I will not let this paper’s attempt to malign my name stop me from kissing Diane Fienstien’s butt and pushing Agjobs and any other open border proposal down the publics throat before they finally kick me outta here.”
The early morning reports on ABC Radio said “there was no evidence to discredit the claims.” Someone makes an unsubstantiated allegation and you need “evidence” to disprove a rumor? Put some ice on it Larry.
Get ready for it....
Most Libs now believe our Achilles heels that will get them into the halls of power in ‘08 are toe-tapping Republicans, and Illegal ALiens...
No but it could mean she is ready to switch parties and start her own "News" web site.
Senator Craig has been a dirty, nasty, boy.
Hey you, on the next thread, pass some tissue.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
I suspect his stance is already about as wide as it can get...
Laughing at the headline.
Senator Craig needs to resign.
In my mind, there is very little worse than hypocrisy and lying.
Senator Craig stood up and told the world that he was resigning and then backpedaled and lied and now he’s going to stay.
He’s a liar and a hypocrite.
Clinton was on trial for sexual harassment charges (that he dropped trousers in front of an employee who was brought to a hotel room by 2 police officers and that he demanded that she “kiss it”.
His workplace sexcapades were pertinant to that case to show a pattern of such actions in the workplace.
No one has alleged that Senator Craig solicited co-workers or underlings nor that he used his power as a figure of government to use members of law enforcement to coerrce anyone into sexual favors.
The question isn’t even if Senator Craig had sex in public. It is simply whether he ever had gay sex in private (possibly after a public unspoken solicitation based on arcane hand gestures).
Bill Clinton lied under oath about his workplace sex affairs, paid Monica to also lie for him, and savaged those who told the truth.
Care to show the other similarities than just “they were about sex”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.