To: highball
That's a failure of leadership.
I certainly agree. But that also takes us to a chicken and egg discussion. Do leaders shape the nation or must there be a desire within the nation for leaders who will lead in this or that direction?
I would say that it takes both factors operating equally to forge a great nation. Adversity seems to be the catalyst for bringing about the leadership and support necessary to create and sustain a nation of free people. And it's going to take one hell of jolt to shake a fat, dumb, and happy society out of its slumber.
The only Pub candidate who consistently demonstrates, to me, that he knows just what's in play in the current situation is Hunter, and he's not going anywhere at this point. Huckabee's rise in the polls and Paul's substantial support are nothing more than an expression of the electorate's fascination with outsiders, a la Perot. The remaining Pub candidates, at present, seem to be once again coalescing in the middle of the road as has been the case since Reagan. That's what their pollsters are no doubt recommending.
134 posted on
12/04/2007 9:56:31 AM PST by
PerConPat
(A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground.-- Mencken)
To: PerConPat
Can’t disagree with your summary of the current political situation.
I would argue that in late September of 2001, we had a nation desperately calling out for real leadership, a place we haven’t been since Pearl Harbor and which we (hopefully) won’t see again in our lifetimes.
135 posted on
12/04/2007 10:01:12 AM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson