Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Washington Finally Getting Into It? [Bank Bail-out]
Decision Point ^ | 30 November 2007 | Sy Harding

Posted on 12/02/2007 6:37:11 PM PST by Rockitz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: dalereed

You’ll suffer too. And your neighbors, friends, parents, brothers, children...things don’t happen in a vaccuum.

Let me ask - how is it a “bail out” if all the Treasury department did is negotiate a few things? There is no evidence they gave the lenders any cash.


21 posted on 12/02/2007 7:02:03 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: saganite
One word. Gold standard. Well, two words.

Two words, bad idea.

22 posted on 12/02/2007 7:03:55 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Don’t tell them that. It ruins the doom-gasm.


23 posted on 12/02/2007 7:04:15 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Tell them to wait!! I need a couple of days to withdraw all of the equity out of my house via a teaser rate ARM so that I can scam the system, too.

EXACTLY! DO IT NOW! AND STOP MAKING YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENTS! NOW!

How are they going to decide gets to keep their "teaser" rate -- probably by whether they've been making their payments on time or not, right?

Be irresponsible and get the bailout, be prudent and get disgusted.

24 posted on 12/02/2007 7:07:45 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

It keeps the bank from having to assume ownership of a lot of foreclosures and sell them at a loss. That’s the bailout.


25 posted on 12/02/2007 7:10:03 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Banks forced by the US GOvernment to make loans they knew were risky, all in the name of diversity.

Well not exactly. Hedge funds and investment banks were falling all over themselves in their hurry to shovel money at mortgage brokers, who were in the business of giving loans to deadbeats and charging them gargantuan fees. The mortgage brokers would take the steaming piles of option ARM loans and sell them to the hedgies and IBs, who would repackage them neatly into much larger steaming piles, put a big ribbon on top and sell them to fools with a trillion dollars of your and my retirement money. It was fun while it lasted.

26 posted on 12/02/2007 7:10:09 PM PST by Pelham (No Deportation, the new goal of the Amnesty Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Actually, from what I heard, if they paid on time before the adjustment and it was apparently only the increased rate that hurt them, they qualify.

If they were late even before it adjusted, no dice.


27 posted on 12/02/2007 7:10:13 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
One could literally operate a very profitable business that 1) employed highly compensated lobbyists, 2) took lobbying fees from affected businesses, and 3) bet on their employees' ability to successfully lobby our corrupt politicians for bail-outs like this....plus our politicians get new vacation homes in Aspen or a nice deposit to their off-shore account.

The Circle of Greed is complete and taxpayers and other responsible citizens take it in the @$$ again.

28 posted on 12/02/2007 7:10:20 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

I’m not sure what everybody’s wailing and gnashing their teeth about, here. This is just another form of forebearance, only writ large. Slowing the pace of foreclosure will allow the market to absorb more excess housing on the market, thereby supporting resale prices, and helping to prevent a colossal loss of personal wealth in this country. It also will calm a major case of jitters in financial circles, and will go a long way to help “unfreeze” the credit market.

So, this is far superior to any of the ill-concieved political “solution” rumblings coming out of Congress, imho. Even if there were to be some sort of behind-the-scenes injection of funding, it can’t possibly be any more costly than what has already occurred, as far as attempts to shore up the financial system.


29 posted on 12/02/2007 7:10:54 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

A lot of companies have already gone out of business, several thousand have lost their jobs, and several thousand have lost their homes. America has a lot more important enemies than people who got variable rate loans.


30 posted on 12/02/2007 7:11:04 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

Well it didn’t cost the taxpayers anything...shouldn’t you be thankful for that?

I think it’s a reasonable solution. Let’s face it, we both know that something would have been done...whether we liked it or not.

Better this than a Hillary-type thing where you, me, and other taxpayers would have paid off other people’s mortgages.


31 posted on 12/02/2007 7:11:27 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Correction:

Option ARMS didn’t go to deadbeats.

You have to have decent credit to get them, always have.


32 posted on 12/02/2007 7:12:22 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Don’t try to inject common-sense into this debate...the doom-and-gloomers and the vultures will jump all over you.


33 posted on 12/02/2007 7:13:21 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

See my post #20.


34 posted on 12/02/2007 7:13:41 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Doom-gasm: n. The climax resulting from observing the misfortunes and bad things happening to beings other than oneself, common during times of economic and social turmoil, consisting of a series of involuntary muscle contractions in the lower pelvic muscles accompanied by a sudden release of endorphins providing a feeling of euphoria.


35 posted on 12/02/2007 7:16:55 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

You like?


36 posted on 12/02/2007 7:17:17 PM PST by RockinRight (Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

“Doomgasm” is very good, though that makes so many of these doomtastic threads a little too “spoogy” for my tolerance.


37 posted on 12/02/2007 7:20:36 PM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal troika: romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Even if there were to be some sort of behind-the-scenes injection of funding, it can’t possibly be any more costly than what has already occurred, as far as attempts to shore up the financial system.

BTW, that "behind-the-scenes injection of funding" further devalues those hard earned dollars of those seeking to invest in hard assets such as housing. Once again the irresponsible are rewarded at the expense of the responsible.

38 posted on 12/02/2007 7:21:18 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

You actually think responsible savers and investors won’t be hurt, if this is allowed to snowball?


39 posted on 12/02/2007 7:21:19 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Actually, I’m OK with this, assuming the Treasury dept. didn’t actually pay the banks any money to do it, and it appears that they did not.

Which is why I am surprised so many people have their panties in a bind over this. This is a market solution where both parites benefit.

40 posted on 12/02/2007 7:22:23 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson