Replies

Fred is the GOP candidate,as Rush pointed out,the closest to a true conservative.
Plus,he has “the voice.” Would you vote for Tiny Tim or James Earl Jones to go up against Sister Mary Elephant? Reagan the Great also had “the voice” and could read “Dick and Jane at the Seashore” and make it sound like the Gettysburg Address.FDR was ugly as HRC yet the crypto-commie’s speaches were gripping and convinced most Americans that Big Government was a good thing.
History has proven that looks count but looks without good diction count little while even poor looks but with great diction counts a lot.JFK and RR both had good looks and great diction but none like them are running in 2008.Fred is the only candidate HRC would refuse to debate because it would indeed sound like James Earl Jones versus Sister Mary Elephant and Bill’s “dominance over dignity” female version of a cuckold knows it.”The Voice” is best described as “firm,correct and heavily laden with either testosterone or estrogen,”depending,of course,on one’s sex.For instance Maggie Thatcher and Golda Meir have and had the female “voice” along with the appropriate ideology and look at their astonishing legacies.Now remember,the hormone factor in “the voice” equation doesn’t necessarilly mean “sexiness”(though it couldn’t hurt-see JFK),it means that only,without doubt and in clear and traditional understanding,REAL men and women can be taken seriously by the masses both sentient and liberal.
So we have a conservative with “the voice” trailing the GOP pack while a socialist with “the cackle” is leading her’s.
What’s wrong with this picture?
Obviously,like Animal Farm,many in the New Media seek the same perks as the Old Media they endeaver to overthrow had.
Frankly,I wonder if Reagan The Great would have done worse in 1980 if the liberal mainstream media did NOT then have a monopoly.