Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2CAVTrooper

2CAVTrooper wrote:

What about the possibility of an aircraft borne device?

************

Generally no.

Go back to the Trinity test site. That thing atop the tower, with all the wires, wooden scaffolding, shielding, flux meters, test mice, that’s what we’re talking about here.

Additionally, any general ordering such an attack knows he could easily get caught, earn nuclear reprisals, and have his own device fail to function properly. All the risk, none of the benefit.

Except in the case of known tested plans, like those peddled by A.Q. Khan, nuclear wanna-be’s generally require successful testing before they’re sure enough to depend on the result.


172 posted on 12/06/2007 5:00:28 AM PST by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: jeffers
“Additionally, any general ordering such an attack knows he could easily get caught, earn nuclear reprisals, and have his own device fail to function properly. All the risk, none of the benefit.”

Yeah well Mymood Imonajihad doesn’t care about that because he sees it as a means for the return of the 12th imam.

And even if the bomb fails, detonating a plane load of plutonium over a major city makes it uninhabitable for a thousand years.

Think of the dispersion of the above scenario compared to a dirty bomb in a semi truck.

173 posted on 12/06/2007 12:41:50 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Ask Yourself: What's FREEDOM worth if you're dead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson