Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israelis hit Syrian ‘nuclear bomb plant’(using N. Korean plutonium)
Times of London ^ | 12/02/07 | Uzi Mahnaimi & Michael Sheridan

Posted on 12/02/2007 2:49:01 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2007 2:49:04 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

Red alert!


2 posted on 12/02/2007 2:50:19 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
A truly big story would be an Israeli hit on a NK plant....heh heh heh...
3 posted on 12/02/2007 2:55:34 AM PST by Tainan (Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

TOO much talking, not enough action.


4 posted on 12/02/2007 3:01:52 AM PST by FReepapalooza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

You have a good tag line.


5 posted on 12/02/2007 3:02:33 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Alouette; jveritas; FARS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; knighthawk; Marine_Uncle; SandRat; ...
Report Syria was building warheads with NKorean plutonium ping.
6 posted on 12/02/2007 3:02:42 AM PST by elhombrelibre (GEN Petraeus is MAN of the YEAR. Ron Paul is the Jane Fonda of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

BINGO

“Pyongyang must reveal the amount of plutonium it has extracted; the reality of its uranium enrichment program; and the alleged transfer of nuclear technology and materials to other countries such as Syria, the sources said.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1933481/posts

U.S. to set 3 more tasks for N. Korea / New hurdles for delisting as terror sponsor

Takashi Sakamoto / Yomiuri Shimbun Correspondent

WASHINGTON—The U.S. government has decided to impose three new conditions for removing North Korea from Washington’s list of state sponsors of terrorism, sources close to the six-party talks said Friday.

Pyongyang must reveal the amount of plutonium it has extracted; the reality of its uranium enrichment program; and the alleged transfer of nuclear technology and materials to other countries such as Syria, the sources said.

These points should be made clear when North Korea completes its declaration of its nuclear programs by the end of this year, the sources added.

The new conditions will be in addition to the current U.S. requirement that North Korea complete the disablement of its nuclear facilities.

It is now likely that North Korea will not be removed from the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism anytime soon, since it is unlikely that the country will accept all four conditions, the sources said.

It is believed that the United States and North Korea had agreed on the removal of the reclusive state from the terrorism sponsor list and punitive measures mandated by the U.S. Trading with the Enemy Act in return for Pyongyang disabling its nuclear facilities and fully declaring its nuclear programs by year’s end.

Although the background of the new U.S. measures is unclear, the U.S. government is believed to have taken into consideration Japan’s strong demand to keep North Korea on the terrorism sponsor list.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill, the chief U.S. delegate for the six-party talks, said Thursday in Seoul that North Korea “is required to list all of their [nuclear] programs, facilities and all of the materials. That is what the declaration is for.” Hill will travel to Pyongyang on Monday and stay there until Wednesday.

However, North Korea has not submitted an initial draft nuclear listing, even though only one month remains before the the deadline to complete the declaration.

In relation to the three new conditions, North Korea has flatly denied the existence of an uranium enrichment program and of providing nuclear technology and materials to other countries.

It is also believed that North Korea is reluctant to declare its current nuclear weaponry stockpile, including plutonium, which is used to make nuclear bombs and warheads.

Hill is scheduled to meet North Korea’s chief nuclear envoy, Vice Foreign Minister Kim Gye Gwan. However, negotiations on the declaration are likely to face rough going unless North Korea changes its stance.

Chief delegates to the six-party talks, scheduled to meet next week in Beijing, will highly likely face difficulties while discussing the declaration.


7 posted on 12/02/2007 3:04:03 AM PST by midway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Syria is one of Putin’s best arms customers. Like Iran, he’s done his best to make sure they’re a threat to the civilized world.
8 posted on 12/02/2007 3:04:56 AM PST by elhombrelibre (GEN Petraeus is MAN of the YEAR. Ron Paul is the Jane Fonda of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

A bigger story would be the destruction of all of Iran’s oil facilities.


9 posted on 12/02/2007 3:06:17 AM PST by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Critics in the United States say proof that North Korea supplied such nuclear weapons material to Syria, a state technically at war with Israel, would shatter congressional confidence in the Bush administration’s diplomatic policy.

Bush's fault. He should take out the "Axis of Evil" before it's too late.

10 posted on 12/02/2007 3:06:21 AM PST by FatherofFive (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

11 posted on 12/02/2007 3:06:39 AM PST by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

While I don’t have a link, I remember “not a reactor, but a bomb assembly plant” being speculated upon in another thread, probably a week or so ago.


12 posted on 12/02/2007 3:09:11 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why wasn’t an emergeancy meeting of the UN Security Council called?


13 posted on 12/02/2007 3:39:48 AM PST by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

Great tagline


14 posted on 12/02/2007 3:42:18 AM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

We were in Jerusalem last week and the Israeli’s re-arrested the guy who originally revealed their bomb program.
It appeared that he had re-entered Israel with a British tour group. He was arrested at the Notre Dame Hotel.
I don’t think that has hit the press yet..but my wife was present at the time.


15 posted on 12/02/2007 3:44:09 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If Syria got weapons grade plutonium from North Korea, why does anyone believe Iran didn’t get it some time ago? And if Iran has had weapons grade plutonium for some time now, why would anyone believe they haven’t already made weapons from it? They are far more capable than Syria.

With that in mind, has Iran been taunting Israel to strike one of Iran’s nuke sites so that Iran can retaliate with nuclear weapons while claiming self defense. Obviously Iran knows Israel will retaliate - what’s left of it - but do they really care? They need major destruction all around to bring the 12’th Imam from his hole...

16 posted on 12/02/2007 3:57:56 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

bkm


17 posted on 12/02/2007 3:58:19 AM PST by sure_fine (• " not one to over kill the thought process " •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Why the H... don’t we just nuke a few bad guys?
What good is it being a super power if we have to worry what other nations think? It’s not like they would do anything but talk and condemn us. They do that anyway.


18 posted on 12/02/2007 4:01:17 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Before the government can give you a dollar it must first take it from another American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Wonder if there would be a nice blue glow on a night picture of the same site?


19 posted on 12/02/2007 4:05:33 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: There is no god named Allah, and Muhammed is a false prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“would shatter congressional confidence in the Bush administration’s diplomatic policy.”

HUH?


20 posted on 12/02/2007 4:07:07 AM PST by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson