To: bruinbirdman
I believe the bottom line of the UK report is just as applicable to the US Navy and the US Armed Forces in general. Billary and Hillary did not hide their contempt for U.S. forces; they gutted the numbers and capabilties of the Armed Forces and Intel forces for some inexplicable reason.
Had they not eliminated so much of the Military’s capabilities, we would have been able to field a much more decisive effort against OBL while still maintaining the ability to contest two or more other sizable efforts elsewhere.
19 posted on
12/01/2007 9:26:13 PM PST by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: Rembrandt
"I believe the bottom line of the UK report is just as applicable to the US Navy and the US Armed Forces in general."
That's a good point.
23 posted on
12/02/2007 2:37:35 AM PST by
familyop
To: Rembrandt
Billary and Hillary did not hide their contempt for U.S. forces; they gutted the numbers and capabilties of the Armed Forces and Intel forces for some inexplicable reason.
Who controlled congress from 94 to 2000
Who does the Constitution give the power to raise and maintain etc etc
27 posted on
12/02/2007 5:40:35 AM PST by
uncbob
(m first)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson