Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProCivitas
Exactly. A consistent 26-year record of Pro-Family, Fair Trade, and Immigration Control. That's what America wants. But have any of the major polling firms dared to take that poll? Not to my knowledge.

I have hung with Hunter for months now, and I can see no reason that he's not doing better--not media bias, not party intrigue, nothing. This guy should have been top tier from day one, and he can't get out of the basement. To me that says his campaign is poorly organized.

81 posted on 12/01/2007 8:17:41 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
IMO, it is a combination of things. He has not been a mayor, governor, or senator; he has lacked name recognition with the media having consistently ignored him; Huckabee is diverting votes from him.
84 posted on 12/01/2007 8:25:13 PM PST by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

This guy should have been top tier from day one, and he can’t get out of the basement. To me that says his campaign is poorly organized.
############################################################

You’re right about that. He didn’t even have a web site for a couple of months after he announced. He never went to Richard Vigurie for help and support. He never got the mailing lists from groups like the NRA, The National Conservative Political Action Committee, ACU PAC, Focus on the Family, Gun Owners of America, JPFO, and the national right to life groups.

All these groups are natural constituencies for him and have a history of raising money as well as a natural source of volunteers for the campaign.

He didn’t seem aware that the MSM and the Republican Party insiders were going to ignore him and that he had to go around them like Reagan had to do. Some of the same Republican insiders who opposed Reagan are still in positions of power in the party and don’t want a conservative nominated.

Donald Rumsfeld’s May 1976 memo to Ford’s Chief of Staff, Dick Cheney, regarding Reagan’s growing popularity and poll numbers states:

“THE MEMBERSHIP
— Many of the members of these groups are not loyal Republicans or Democrats. They are alienated from both parties because neither takes a sympathetic view toward their issues. Particularly those groups controlled by Vigurie hold a “rule or ruin” attitude toward the GOP. They are deeply interested in their particular issues, they will work to support their positions, they will turn out to vote in larger numbers than party regulars.

THE POLITICAL OPERATION
— The fund raising capability and the mailing lists enable these groups to carry out effective political operations in the primary cross-over states and in the caucus states through the use of three techniques:
a. Independent advertising. Being well funded, they can afford to conduct independent advertising campaigns on behalf of Reagan. Such expenditures are not chargeable to Reagan’s campaign.
b. Direct mail. They can target an effective direct mail campaign based on responses to fund raising mail using outrageous literature designed to motivate people interested in a right wing cause.
c. Voter turnout. The mailing lists can be turned into telephone lists and door-to-door canvassing lists and used to turn the vote out. These lists can be given to Reagan county chairmen or to the active organization members in an area for use in the voter turnout program. In a state where the GOP vote is traditionally small such an effort can be devastating. In caucus states where a few people attend the county caucuses such an effort can control the state conventions.

CONCLUSION
We are in real danger of being out-organized by a small number of highly motivated right wing nuts, who are using funds outside of the Reagan campaign expenditure limits. This fact explains the Reagan position on the FEC. If he can keep the FEC immobilized, this assistance to his campaign will not come to light. He is thus able to operate a relatively moderate campaign to capitalize on his natural support and obtain the winning margin from the right wingers support.”

Reagan lost to Ford and the elites in 1976, and Ford lost to Carter. But in 1980, Reagan and his “right wing nuts” went around the Party elites, and the media, got their message out early, won the nomination, and won the general election in a landslide. Hunter could have done the same thing Reagan did in 1980 if he had managed his campaign better at the start.

It was like he and his team weren’t around in 1976 and 1980 or weren’t paying attention back then. Whatever the case, he and every other conservative candidate, should study the Reagan/Ford battles and understand that they are fighting the Rockefeller Republicans who run the party as well as the MSM in the primaries.

Hunter could win in a Reagan sized landslide, but he’ll never get nominated now.


117 posted on 12/01/2007 10:01:51 PM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson