We are choosing the next POTUS here, not some anonymous city council member. We elect the POTUS - indirectly, via the Electoral College - to serve us in many ways, the most important of which is to maintain our security against forces who would like to undermine all of what our country has been about for 200+ years. A condition that a prospective POTUS may have can impair that individual's performance in office without being life threatening. Therefore, while not all medical records of a candidate are important to voters, those related to potentially debilitating physical or mental illnesses very much are.
an std is not debilitating. If you are looking at any thing that would impair performance, you are casting a broad net.
GWB was a former alcoholic, Lincoln had melancholia, Roosevelt was in a wheel chair prone to infections, Reagan had a dementia.
There is hardly a human alive without something that could possibly impair performance.
What people want here is to fish thru Hillary’s records looking for seamy stuff or imaginary seamy stuff to smear her with.
I cannot stand her but I cannot stand that tactic. Much less the holier than thou attitudes of those with one agenda only, to smear her.
If the same people focused on her actions as a political and public person, they would earn admiration.