Skip to comments.
CRACKPOT REVOLUTION
New York Post ^
| December 1, 2007
| RYAN SAGER
Posted on 12/01/2007 5:07:38 AM PST by fweingart
FOLKS in Washington seem to think that the unexpected success of Ron Paul in the Republican primary suggests the country is in some kind of "libertarian moment" that will reshape American politics.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: paulqaeda; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Well, we are in need of a revolution!
1
posted on
12/01/2007 5:07:38 AM PST
by
fweingart
To: fweingart
Howard Dean was far more successful.
2
posted on
12/01/2007 5:09:44 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: fweingart
Perot was doing his own “revolution” thing until the sanity thing became a problem...
3
posted on
12/01/2007 5:10:54 AM PST
by
DB
To: fweingart
It says something when I see the title alone, and immediately think “Ron Paul.”
4
posted on
12/01/2007 5:11:09 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: fweingart
Medical marijuana and blindness regarding the Jihadists wish to kill all Americans... that’s what’s motivating the wacko’s supporting L Ron Paul.
5
posted on
12/01/2007 5:11:27 AM PST
by
samtheman
To: BibChr
6
posted on
12/01/2007 5:13:35 AM PST
by
badpacifist
(They say your head can be a prison Then, these are just conjugal visits.)
To: samtheman
If al Qaeda could vote, they’d vote for Run Paul.
7
posted on
12/01/2007 5:16:06 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(GEN Petraeus is MAN of the YEAR. Ron Paul is the Jane Fonda of the year.)
To: fweingart
Paul’s got an excellent and, I believe inarguably correct stand on 10th Amendment type issues as well as the pork spending insanity. But I would have to agree after that he tends to wander off the reservation.
8
posted on
12/01/2007 5:17:52 AM PST
by
n230099
("If you don't blame the camera for porn, then don't blame the gun for shootings". (Unknown))
To: fweingart
I would vote for anyone running against Ron Paul....but hand it to the guy’s team...they have worked the internet/fund raising very well.
9
posted on
12/01/2007 5:20:08 AM PST
by
rrrod
To: fweingart
FOLKS in Washington think?
Shrimp boats ia a-comin, their pork is in sight.
Shrimp boats ia a-comin, they will be druggies tonight.
“Shrimp boats ia a-comin”
I apologize to the song writer.
10
posted on
12/01/2007 5:23:37 AM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Rudy,Romney,McCain, Huckabee send a self-abused stomped elephant to the DRNC.)
To: elhombrelibre
If al Qaeda could vote, theyd vote for Run Paul.Au contraire, mon ami. (A little French there to demonstrate the esteem I hold for M. Sarkozy.)
The islamokillers would vote for Madame Klinton! She's their kind of guy!
11
posted on
12/01/2007 5:24:49 AM PST
by
fweingart
(Life's a bitch. So why vote for one?)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
12
posted on
12/01/2007 5:25:13 AM PST
by
fweingart
(Life's a bitch. So why vote for one?)
To: DB
Perot's problem was that he was too transparent. He, in his heart of hearts was a dyed in the wool socialist.
He made his bucks by selling computers to his buddy Cuomo who ran the welfare state of New Yarkansas.
13
posted on
12/01/2007 5:27:19 AM PST
by
fweingart
(Life's a bitch. So why vote for one?)
To: fweingart
I got to admit this is the first time I’ve heard Perot called a socialist, care to expand on that.
14
posted on
12/01/2007 5:32:56 AM PST
by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: fweingart
The islamokillers would vote for Madame Klinton!
She's their kind of guy!Huma agrees.
15
posted on
12/01/2007 5:39:18 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Nice rainbow flowers Hillary!)
To: fweingart
Sorry sport, although I agree with the sentiment, I hardly believe that Islamofacist killers would vote for any woman especially one who "doesn't know her place" and isn't a burka wearing baby factory.
That's the real tragedy about the Left, they are unable to comprehend that they are the very people that would be the first to be killed. Whether it's Osama ben Laden or "Uncle Joe" Stalin, Liberals would be the first to be lined up and killed and they are so arrogant they can't even comprehend that fact.
Sorry, what started out as a smart-a$$ comment turned into a rant. Some people just bring that out in me and HilldeBEAST is one of them.
16
posted on
12/01/2007 5:43:06 AM PST
by
Sudetenland
(Liberals love "McCarthyism," they just believe he was targeting the wrong side.)
To: fweingart
If it weren’t for his foreign policy, domestic policy, and economic policy, I would be in favor of him.
To: fweingart
"The islamokillers would vote for Madame Klinton! She's their kind of guy!"
18
posted on
12/01/2007 5:57:06 AM PST
by
sure_fine
(• " not one to over kill the thought process " •)
To: Sudetenland
...a smart-a$$ comment...You got that part right.
The 'brains' behind the islamic jihad movement would use anything, or anybody that would fit into their scheme of destroying western civilization.
Hitlery knows in her 'mind' what her place in history should be, and is hardly a baby factory.
19
posted on
12/01/2007 5:57:19 AM PST
by
fweingart
(Life's a bitch. So why vote for one?)
To: sure_fine
may as well add this one too...
20
posted on
12/01/2007 5:58:16 AM PST
by
sure_fine
(• " not one to over kill the thought process " •)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson