Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoketree; 2banana
So they’re the same as all other Marines???????

Yes. The Marines long ago deliberately rejected any kind of "special" designations because ALL Marines are "special forces".

16 posted on 11/30/2007 8:56:18 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard; smoketree; 2banana; RedRover

Special Operations forces are far more that behind the lines commandos in this new technological era. Having watched them, I’d say that they have tactics and techniques that would be useful for any military force, but would be beyond the financial and training capacity of a regular unit.

I understand why the Marines would go the route of Special Ops, and I consider it wise.


29 posted on 12/01/2007 3:37:26 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Lancey Howard

“The Marines long ago deliberately rejected any kind of “special” designations because ALL Marines are “special forces”.

Yes. The Marine “special forces” called “Marine Raiders” were used in the Makin and Guadalcanal campaigns, and then disbanded about 1943 for the exact reason you stated. Ditto for the “Paramarines.”


31 posted on 12/01/2007 6:01:05 AM PST by sergeantdave (The majority of Michigan voters are that stupid and the condition is incipient and growing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson