Why would I want to give money to support a group whose values and beliefs are diametrically opposed to mine? 
Posted on 11/30/2007 8:06:34 PM PST by Coleus
As the movie studios gear up for a big Christmas movie season, one trailer that looks like a blockbuster is "The Golden Compass," which must be trying to cash in on the "Narnia" movies. It has flashy special-effect polar bears in armor and a young heroic damsel in distress facing off against evil forces. The casting is top-notch, led by Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig, the current star spy in the James Bond movies. But buyer beware: Narnia it's not. It's the anti-Narnia. Instead of a Christian allegory, it's an anti-Christian allegory. The author of "The Golden Compass," Philip Pullman, is an atheist who despises C. S. Lewis and his much-beloved Narnia series. "I thought they were loathsome," he said of those books, "full of bullying and sneering, propaganda, basically, on behalf of a religion whose main creed seemed to be to despise and hate people unlike yourself."
This book and movie is only the first in his trilogy, titled "His Dark Materials," that gets more and more anti-religious in each book. Pullman hates orthodox religion and "those who pervert and misuse religion, or any other kind of doctrine with a holy book and a priesthood and an apparatus of power that wields unchallengeable authority, in order to dominate and suppress human freedoms." If you hear the ring of anti-Catholicism, you're right. The evil empire in this movie for children is called the "Magisterium," which is exactly the word Catholics use to describe the teaching authority of the Pope and his bishops. The books are more explicit, in which the evil institution is also called "The Church" and the higher-ups are the "Vatican Council."
British columnist Peter Hitchens has explained how our secular thought-shapers would love for Pullman to undercut Narnia's influence on children: "The cultural elite would like to wipe out this pocket of resistance. They have successfully expelled God from the schools, from the broadcast media and, for the most part, from the Church itself." He writes that while Lewis mocked atheists as joyless, Pullman depicts priests as evil and murderous, drunk and probably perverted, and the Church as "a conspiracy against happiness and kindness."
Isn't it a bit perverse to head into the Christmas holiday season hyping an atheist fantasy movie for kids? No doubt sensing this, Pullman and the moviemakers have ventured on a dishonest but energetic public-relations campaign to convince the public that this film isn't really anti-Christian. It's a plea for open-mindedness and spiritual dialogue. The Church is just a metaphor, see. The movie's director, Chris Weitz, spins it this way: "In the books, the Magisterium is a version of the Catholic Church gone wildly astray from its roots. If that's what you want in the film, you'll be disappointed." Weitz says they merely "expanded the range of meanings" for the Magisterium, that it's merely a metaphor for tyranny of any stripe: "Philip Pullman is against any kind of organized dogma whether it is Church hierarchy or, say, a Soviet hierarchy." That would be more believable if Hollywood had a track record of casting a Soviet hierarchy as evil -- and if Hollywood didn't have its own organized dogma of secular fundamentalism.
Nicole Kidman spins it her way: "I was raised Catholic, the Catholic Church is part of my essence. I wouldn't be able to do this film if I thought it were at all anti-Catholic." The media have played happily along in disguising Pullman's religion-bashing. On NBC's "Today," weatherman Al Roker delighted in making "The Golden Compass" the fall book selection of "Al's Book Club for Kids." Pullman appeared on NBC to deny that he was really promoting atheism. He touted letting the reader decide what the author intended, in a "democracy of reading." The closest he came to atheism was saying the book championed "open-minded intellectual curiosity." If that sounds like a transparent dodge, it certainly was. He told the students asking questions to think of the Taliban in Afghanistan. But the menace in Pullman's trilogy isn't called the Caliphate, and its hideous monsters aren't mullahs. They are cardinals and priests, and the heroes are an atheist former nun and two rebellious gay male angels.
The atheists may be angry that the movie waters down Pullman's anti-religious message, but they can take comfort in the fact that many parents (and grandparents and even godparents) will, sadly, buy the hype over this movie and buy this trilogy of vicious anti-religious books for the young readers in their lives. To the Christian book buyer, beware: Instead of celebrating God's son born in the flesh, you'll be celebrating God being killed so that man can advance to true consciousness. For those anticipating the wonder of Narnia, you'll have to wait until next May, when "Prince Caspian," the second installment, returns magic to the screen.
Why would I want to give money to support a group whose values and beliefs are diametrically opposed to mine?
All I want for Christmas is...
a fast-track for “The Golden Compass” STRAIGHT TO THE DVD CUT-OUT BIN!
“I wonder how well this will do? Although these are cynical times, Anti-Christian polemics don’t prosper at Christmas.”
The problem is that they’re hiding the anti-religious themes in the first films, but plan to bring them back full-force if sequels are made. Both the author and director admit to this. This movie is candy coated atheism. The sequels will be a full shot of the real thing.
The strategy here is to lure families into theaters for what appears to be a Narnia-clone. Once the kids get hooked, and the audience is built in, the sequels come later when the kids go into their teens and are more susceptible to the rebellious atheism message. It’s actually a brilliant strategy, almost Satanic in its plan of attack. Attract innocence by embracing it, then destroy it once you’ve grabbed hold of them.
“Nicole Kidman spins it her way: “I was raised Catholic, the Catholic Church is part of my essence. I wouldn’t be able to do this film if I thought it were at all anti-Catholic.”
For someone so concerned about the Catholic Church, she had no problem marrying a Scientologist and doing a soft-core movie for Stanley Kubrick.
“I know - the public schools can send their grade schoolers as a group during school hours as a pre-winter break celebration! That ought to prop up revenues!”
Funny you should say this...Google News had a story about a school up North that was doing precisely that...organizing field trips to see the movie. A Christian parent complained, and that’s why it made the news.
Good post. I think you are correct.
“If Christians or any other religious group are offended, maybe it’s because they are seeing so many parallels between their own religion’s past and Pullman’s depiction of a tyrannical, oppressive, fictional religious order.
And that’s organized religion’s fault, not Pullman’s.”
Wonderful. I just love that the atheist libertarians have invaded Free Republic like cockroaches.
“No, but there’s a common thread of condemning and denouncing works of art - books, films, cartoons, whatever - without any first-hand knowledge about them, based on what some religious authority tells them.”
Geek, that’s disenginuous and you damn well know it. Even if you hadn’t read the book, the author himself is very upfront about what he wants to do ....”My books are about killing God”.
No one is calling for the books or movies to be banned. We’re doing what Americans should do in this situation...talk to each other and encourage a boycott. Vote by withholding our dollars. If you’ve got a problem with THAT, too bad.
“Religious people sometimes get so worked up over the creative works of others - what are they so afraid of?”
And Atheists get worked up over the fact that most people are believers and that their bitter, cynical views are ignored.
The movie was, if I recall, about a "delusional Christ with possible homosexual issues" - and regarding the old Gay mantra, "How do you know you wouldn't like it if you've never tried it?" I can only respond that I've never eaten $h!t either but I just know that somehow, I wouldn't like it.
My judgement is unchanged, "The Last Temptation of Christ" was a vile piece of garbage!
Well said.
The only answer needed (for those who think Christians are over-reacting) is to simply read the words of the author. He would seem to be an adequate authority on the true intent of the books and movie.
What does a Family or Christmas tree have to do with the birth of Christ? I find if a little funny when Europeans like myself took Pagan rituals surrounding the Winter Solstice and attached them to Jesus Christ’s birth.
You might want to invest in a small voice activated tape recorder so (just in case) you can get your job back, or better still, a settlement large enough to put you through a couple years of school.
Love your tagline!
But you must keep in mind that atheists, like liberal Democrats, are more enlightened than us and are, therefore, entitled to having it both ways. Hypocrisy is a solely conservative and Christan vice!
I believe that for the VAST majority of movie goers, the athiest themes will pass right over their heads. If they see it, they will see the movie for escapist fun.
What's up with that?
One film I will not watch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.