to me, uncommitted means, I haven’t been paying attention. having not paid attention, they won’t be aware of all her corruption, lies, etc. they likely tune into the MSM now and again. they’ll go for the frontrunner and familiar name.
This is some background on Michigan’s primary:
“Michigan’s presidential primaries take many forms over the years”
http://www.woodtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7405315&nav=0RcdWDXo
From what I’ve read, the Paul followers thought they could exploit this by recruiting sympathetic [particularly antiwar] Dems to vote Republican in the primary and vote for him thereby giving Paul a large percent of the vote. They thought the Dems would feel Hillary was secure so they could switch. But this only works if they were supporting Hillary in the first place and if Hillary was almost assured of walking away with it. That might not be the case now. It’s all very convoluted, but the whole circumstance is definitely unusual and it will be interesting to see how this turns out.
thunder...hoofbeats...four horsemen... I need a vacation.
If she gets beaten by “uncommitted”, it does more than just tarnish her campaign.
And perhaps this will be the thing that keeps many Democrats from crossing parties and voting in the GOP primary in Michigan.
Might be easier to use some Beano
Speaking of ‘uncommitted’ voters, what’s the latest on Leeland Eisenberg? ;)
They are still out there, useless and delusional as ever. Bloody shame they can vote.