Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giuliani campaign team backtracks on tryst talk
NY DAILY NEWS ^ | November 30th 2007 | DAVID SALTONSTALL and MICHAEL SAUL

Posted on 11/30/2007 5:02:39 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Perdogg

It is getting harder and harder just to find one decent man.


61 posted on 11/30/2007 10:00:29 PM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Who cares about his personal life? I don’t. If he had broken the law, he should have been charged

Should people care? Arguable. Will people care next November? Probably.

Hitlery's minions would run attack ads reminding swing state Reagan Democrats of Rudy's disgusting personal life. This is yet another of Rudy's vulnerabilities. It is further evidence that he is not electable next November. As such, he cannot be allowed to win the nomination.

62 posted on 11/30/2007 10:11:52 PM PST by stillonaroll (Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fred
The voter cares and is fed up with this nonsense. One of the big reasons why Clinton’s negatives are so high is because of 8 years of this kind of sleaziness. The Republicans lost congress because of these kinds of problems.

Indeed, that was a big factor last year. Not everyone cares about this kind of stuff, but these kind of scandals swing just enough voters to make a difference.

Even BJ Clinton, running against the inarticulate Bush Sr. and Bob Dole, could not even get a majority. If BJ had lived a cleaner lifestyle, he might have won two landslides.

63 posted on 11/30/2007 10:21:51 PM PST by stillonaroll (Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Most have already made up there minds, regardless of what candidate they support and all posting “negative” stuff will do is to further solidify them in there choice.

I’m convinced it is folly to try and switch someone on this forum from thinking they way you do, so I’m pretty much out of the biz of slamming a candidate and praising another. It is a no-win scenario.

It's true that FReepers, being better informed than the general public, tend to have already made their minds up about who they will vote for. In the larger population, however, negative attack ads are effective, as a well communicated negative message can devastating to a campaign.

I read somewhere, I think about online restaurant reviews, that one negative review has as much impact as ten positive reviews.

64 posted on 11/30/2007 10:27:20 PM PST by stillonaroll (Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tear gas; Perdogg; Extremely Extreme Extremist
Who cares about his personal life?

Isn't it wonderful seeing Republicans take the EXACTLY same defense that Clinton and the Clinton-Apologists took not that long ago???...LOL The 'Clinton Vaccine' is alive and well.

So now Republicans are saying that conduct and character no longer matters??? The irony is incredible. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!!

65 posted on 11/30/2007 10:30:58 PM PST by stockstrader (We need a conservative who will ENERGIZE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

While Rudy had his escapades with his cigar bar bimbo, the NYFirefighters needed radios that worked.


66 posted on 12/01/2007 1:33:34 AM PST by ridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

No. We fired executives that are messing around on the job. Rudy was busy with his latest fling rather than working to get his city working smoothly.


67 posted on 12/01/2007 1:37:02 AM PST by ridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
......the statements Rooty and his attorney made in his very public divorce show just how viscious and uncaring he is.........

It's sickening how the Rudebots cavalierly dismiss every revelation about this hunchbacked egomaniac.

As if every city budget has a provision for financing the Mayor's sexual urges on the taxpayers' dime.

This self-centered sociopath treated his wife and the mother of his children like they were inconvenient sacks of garbage.

68 posted on 12/01/2007 6:18:07 AM PST by Liz (Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Rudy and the NY tax payers also pay to upport Judy and her dirt poor family.

As for Hazleton, the Giulianis are buying more than gas there these days. On Nov. 1, records show, the couple purchased Nathan’s childhood home from her parents for an unspecified sum.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2007/12/01/2007-12-01_city_taxpayers_picked_up_tab_for_judith_-1.html


69 posted on 12/01/2007 6:21:48 AM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I am by no means an expert on something like this. Isn’t doing something like this against the law?


70 posted on 12/01/2007 9:22:32 AM PST by painter (Oval Office, Fred. Might be something you ought to think about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Rudy - the second best democrat in the race.


71 posted on 12/01/2007 9:26:23 AM PST by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Giuliani’s defense of Islam as a ‘GREAT RELIGION’ (his words) in the CNN debate was absolutely disgusting.


72 posted on 12/01/2007 9:47:42 AM PST by stockstrader (We need a conservative who will ENERGIZE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
However, the kind of person that will vote for him won’t care about the stuff posted here. They already know he has low morals and they obviously don’t care.

The point is not that he had an affair. The point is that they cooked the books to hide the affair (and continue to lie and mislead about it).

In other words, this isn't that he has low personal morals, but that his administration was corrupt. Huge difference.

73 posted on 12/03/2007 8:36:21 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is just the beginning for Rudy. If he happens to get the nomination, the Dems are going to be dragging out his dirty laundry over and over again. The American people will (rightfully) be disgusted. Rudy will never be elected President.


74 posted on 12/03/2007 10:09:56 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
If some one were ask Rudy if he was going to take a mistress in White House, then I would say it would be fair game.

His track record says he would.

75 posted on 12/03/2007 10:11:19 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: highball

“In other words, this isn’t that he has low personal morals, but that his administration was corrupt. Huge difference.”

low morals = dishonesty


76 posted on 12/03/2007 3:48:17 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Of course, but there is a distinction between a man who’s a jerk at home and a man who’s crooked on the job.

I’m not voting for a pal, I’m voting for a President. I can overlook a messy personal life, but would never vote for a crooked politician.


77 posted on 12/04/2007 6:59:58 AM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson