Yes I did.
I cite myself verbatim from post 116:
Under the law he is a citizen.
If you are going to respond to my posts without reading them, you are merely wasting time - you aren't making any valid points.
Shows the insanity of your position. His mother is a Mexican national whose only connection to the state of Texas and the States United is that she did criminally enter into them, purposes unknown. He inherits her nationality and the protection of that nation, not the United States or the State of Texas.
Which leads to question 2, Sleepy - why is the phrase "and subject to the jurisdiction" in there?
If you really read the brief, you'd know. And notably you didn't answer that question.
Hey, Joisy, whadja think of the Anchor Brat, huh? Great guy, Real American, ain't he?
According to you he is!
But not to me and the vast majority of people on this forum and thread.
The absurdity of calling such mmm, persons "Americans" offends pretty much anyone with a brain who doesn't willfully disregard the parts of a law they don't understand or like.
Unlike you.