And there are many who don't.
I'm not really interested in the opinions of either.
I'm interested in your opinion, and how you support it using your own arguments and your own research.
I’ve read enough that I’m convinced that the current interpretation of birthright citizenship is wrong. It was NOT intended to provide citizenship for those who basically through accident of birth or frank illegality of their parents with citizenship. The wording of the article itself, as well as argument and statements by those involved in the drafting and ratification make that clear.