This is probably my last contribution to this thread because you're probably not worth the effort here but as I said before the point of the civil law system isn't to force discovery of groups you don't like. Given that our legal system is a precedent-based common-law system, legal precedents obviously matter and when comes back to bite us in the rear don't say you weren't warned or cry about the unfairness of the legal system.
As far the "war for survival" stuff is concerned - if you feel it right to misuse the legal system - then why not have the Constitution and the rule of law suspended altogether?
You keep referring to the “rule of law.” As I’ve said, the courts are there to interpret the rule of law.
Why are you so opposed to letting them do just that?
You are repeating yourself, but not really addressing my points, namely, the salient rebuttals.