And that proves what? Per the suit he would either be 45 or 46 this year and this Leeland, according to reports I’ve read, is 47. Even if they are the same age what exactly does that prove? I’m not saying it’s not him but this is as bad as FOX news saying the perp was Troy Stanley so confidently because “witnesses” said it was him.
Btw, I’ve noticed other arrests and such tied to this perp that aren’t proven either, especially since they are different home addresses. The 2 things known for certain are:
1.) That he tangled with the Rochester police in March of this year. Here’s the article:
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070316/FOSTERS01/103160230
2.) He was supposed to appear in court today with his wife over a domestic dispute.
“Eisenberg was scheduled to appear in Strafford County Superior Court at 1:30 p.m. Friday with his wife for a domestic violence hearing.”
Sorry but getting info correct is a pet peave of mine. :o)
I saw that DU thinks this is him as well so let’s try and be better than them shall we? It may turn out to be him in the end but let’s wait and see.
Ah, that's the same address for the Lisa A. Warren in Rochester I found.