Now we have a name in the CNN Management structure....
“David Bohrman, the network’s Washington bureau chief and the mastermind behind the format”
Now we need to do some research — I wonder if this guy has some relationship to the Clintons. I wouldn’t be surprised.
CNN: You Can Lead A Horticulture
*******************************EXCERPT**************************
Okay, stupid post title. The title should be, "why this debate agriculture matters". For the answer we turn to Hot Air commenter Buy Danish:
Speaking of suits, I posted this on one of the other threads, but look at what the CNN Suit in Chief, David Bohrman, who is their “Washington bureau chief and executive producer of the debate”, promised:From: Sneak Peek at CNN/YouTube Debate Videos/By Ariel Alexovich, dated November 21, 2007.…many of the remaining posts involve asking the candidates to defend their opposition to gay marriage and abortion. Those kinds of “lobbying grenades” would be disqualified by the CNN selection team, Mr. Bohrman said.
“There are quite a few things you might describe as Democratic ‘gotchas,’ and we are weeding those out,” Mr. Bohrman said. CNN wants to ensure that next Wednesday’s Republican event is “a debate of their party.”
The suit has a few questions to answer. I don’t recall any “gay marriage” questions, but they sure did a lousy job of weeding!
Heh. He said "weeding". Looks like he missed a few. Oh, and from that article linked above, let's not let Anderson Cooper off just yet:
Some crafty people seem to think that addressing debate host Anderson Cooper in their video will give them the edge to be chosen, but Mr. Bohrman said such pandering to CNN is grounds for disqualification. Mr. Cooper and two of his researchers are involved in the selection process, Mr. Bohrman noted.I wonder if he noticed that one young lass was such a so totally huge Anderson Cooper fan (as well as an Edwards fan)?
November 29th, 2007
Where Were the Health Care Questions?
*****************************EXCERPT**************************
At a time when CNN had an opportunity to shine as host of last night’s Republican presidential debate, the network faltered. Today conservatives are left with yet another example of bias at the highest level of the media establishment. It’s another sad example of how liberals deliberately portray conservatives as gun-toting, Bible-thumping, and gay-bashing bigots.
I had high hopes for CNN in its role of selecting questions for last night’s debate. The network had nearly 5,000 to choose from — plenty to get a good representation of a variety of issues. Instead, we heard three questions about guns, a topic of significance to the GOP, but was it really that important to ask three different questions? There was also a question attacking trade, another about the North American Union, a silly question about The Holy Bible and two each on abortion (here and here) and homosexuality (here and here). By the time Anderson Cooper got around to introducing a question about the Confederate flag, I was flabbergasted.
It’s no wonder the Politico’s Jonathan Martin wrote on his blog, “Is this the Upper East Side view of the GOP?”
Before the debate, I asked Mitt Romney spokesman Kevin Madden about health care — a topic I figured would play a particularly important role last night. Instead, it didn’t come up at all. John McCain briefly mentioned the SCHIP debate, but it came up in the context of another question.
Is there a more serious public policy debate taking place in Washington right now? YouTube users submitted questions about health care — I know because I looked. Why CNN chose to ignore the subject is a question that should be asked today.
With conservatives already skeptical of CNN, last night’s debate reinforces why so many people on the right think the media are biased. It’s actually probably more accurate to say they’re out of touch with reality — painting the GOP and candidates on stage at the debate in the context of God, guns and gays.
UPDATE — 9:01 a.m.: I just scanned the headlines of a few conservative blogs and I’m not alone in my assessment of CNN. Patrick Ruffini and David All, who were both on hand with me last night, were not impressed. And I’d be remiss not to mention the biggest story of the day — CNN’s use of a gay Hillary Clinton supporter’s question. Matthew Balan at NewsBusters and Kevin Aylward of Wizbang have the details.
UPDATE — 6:06 p.m.: It’s one thing for CNN to deliberately exclude questions about health care, as the network did last night, but it’s another thing for one of its own correspondents to then blame the Republican field for not talking about it. Believe it or not, that’s exactly what happened.
Vivian Lee reports on NewsBusters and Conservative Belle that CNN’s Emily Sherman had the gall to say “the Republican presidential contenders seemed to all but ignore what is considered a major priority for many voters.” Give me a break! Did Sherman even watch the debate?
Not only was it ignorant on Sherman’s part to make such a comment, but she looks foolish because, as Lee points out, the candidates did talk about health care.
Sherman must have missed when health care was brought up by former Governor Mitt Romney (Mass.). When question about pork spending, Romney managed to include his experience with health care insurance.
…
Sherman must have also missed when former Governor Mike Huckabee (Ark.) discussed health care coverage expansion for African-Americans. In response to a question asking why African-Americans don’t vote for Republicans, Huckabee managed to mention his health care initiatives in Arkansas.
That makes at least three candidates — McCain, Romney and Huckabee — who discussed health care on their own without any prodding from CNN. It’s time for Sherman to issue a correction and YouTube to dump CNN as a partner.
UPDATE — 10:45 p.m.: I neglected to link to Joe Garofoli’s story in the San Francisco Chronicle earlier. It’s an excellent recap of the debate from the tech crowd.
I’ve also posted statements from CNN and a release from the Save the Debate coalition here.