Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jokelahoma
Nah, you explained why you think he polls so poorly.

Listen pal, even the Centers for Disease Control conceded that traditional land-line polling is obsolete as they were having a hard time with the results from them. Here, let me break it down for you:

Dr. Paul has thousands of people attending his rallies. He has the most extensive grassroots support of the candidates. He is leading all GOP candidates in fundraising for the 4Q, almost all of it from small, individual donations. He wins straw polls and online polls, and online polls A LIVE PERSON still has to point and click on the radio button to select a choice. You're going to believe that he's at "2%" when overwhelming empirical evidence says otherwise? Your screename is appropriate.

But if you want to be brainwashed by MSM spin, go ahead. But don't deny that he doesn't have support and base this off of obsolete polls conducted by the media, which obviously has an agenda.

89 posted on 11/30/2007 12:09:45 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
One, I'm not your pal and have no interest in being your pal, so save the condescension for someone who falls for that sort of crap. Two, all of your claims are still just your opinion, and obviously you're welcome to it. Mine is that he has no chance at all to garner the nomination for the reasons I've mentioned in previous posts, and I'll stick to that, thanks.

I wonder if Dale Carnegie ever met Paul supporters? Apparently they're not familiar with his books.

98 posted on 11/30/2007 12:30:19 PM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson