No, what's pathetic is that you run to Google to support your arguments, and think you can get away with posting the first things you see.
Since you're new here (?), let me explain. since 1999, I've been making fun of Marx-quoting, class-warfare-embracing, economics-challenged, True Conservatives™. You see, as a free-market, Chicago School conservative, I enjoy the philosophical tussle.
In any case, you should probably learn (soon I hope) that if you propose to argue public policy with a bunch of data-junkies, you'd best make sure that your data comes from somewhere other than what is essentially a DNC think tank. Especially since you accuse other think tanks of authoring Democrat Party material.
That's what it boils down to, my friend. Your knee-jerk reaction to the Heritage data was to call them Democrats. Then you turn around and post Democrat data. If you actually knew what you are doing, I'd call you a hypocrite.
That’s what it boils down to, my friend. Your knee-jerk reaction to the Heritage data was to call them Democrats. Then you turn around and post Democrat data. If you actually knew what you are doing, I’d call you a hypocrite.
*********************
Still doesn’t change the fact that you manipulate statistics. You post nominal wages instead of wages adjusted for inflation, expecting everyone to think that wages have increased 10 fold. Thats what we real Americans and real Republicans call, “evil.”
You Libertarians have never been a part of the Republican party, why don’t you just leave, rejoin the Democrats or stay in limbo. I really don’t care.
-------
Great post. But "hypocrite" is a bit too grandiose for him, I think.
I'd stick with "child."
Hank