Posted on 11/29/2007 8:33:58 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
NYC, a day without Rush need not be a day without sunshine...you can always read the show transcripts every eve after 6 p.m. (no subscription required).
My bet is that he steers with a joystick instead of a steering wheel!!!
Well, so called CONSERVATIVES insisted the GOP had to attend this youtube debate or they’d look bad like the Dems avoiding Fox. People like ruffini spearheaded the charge. The GOP was actually resistent to this at first, so I think more blame has to go to the “conservatives” that pushed them into this. Of course these same “conservatives” are the same ones working overtime to make sure we get a RINO for a nominee.
Try www.wowo.com.
I swear, when he said something like “We are a better country than to go charging children for their parents’ crimes”....this about illegal immigration...I wanted to slap him for an hour.
Those political elites can’t stop glossing over this country’s great concern over this massive immigration problem.
While we were busy carrying this country on our backs whilst raising the soldiers and citizens of tomorrow, our political elites took money from those seeking cheap labor for votes and put a band-aid over the issues we had.
Now we’re mad as hell about it and still they have the termerity to pat us on the head and utter simple platitudes to us.
Why can’t we expect...Good Governance 101...our borders to be protected and those allowed to enter our country to live are vetted for past criminal records, health matters and other issues that will keep them, and us, safe?
Huckabee gives that cute smile and talks to us like we’re idiots. I got his number, thank you.
Funny post I read over at Reason’s hit & run:
“So, the final question, for all the candidates: If you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be?”
ROMNEY: “Spruce . . . no, pine. Maybe larch.”
THOMPSON: “I’d have to consult my horticulturalist.”
HUCKABEE: “Maple, of course.”
GIULIANI: “When I was mayor on 9/11 . . . of, sorry, I mean I’d be the tree that grows in Brooklyn.”
DR. PAUL: “I’m a friggin’ chainsaw, you pathetic hacks.”
iih (aka Ali) | November 28, 2007, 10:39pm | #
Eric Rudy’s answer on “Islam” was excellent. But did not come across to me as that sincere.
But there’s more. According to Lt. Col. Bill Campenni (USAF, ret), one of President Bush’s squadron mates in the Texas Air National Guard, there is no such thing as the California National Reserve of which Kerr claimed to be a former member.
Campenni told HUMAN EVENTS that Kerr is not even a retired Army General.
“He retired as a California Army National Guard colonel,” said Campenni. “It is common at Guard retirement ceremonies to give an honorary promotion to colonels to the STATE rank of Brigadier General…[but] it has no meaning other than a fancy certificate for the wall and use of the title at local Guard functions.”
Campenni said the rank of general is not federally recognized and the title can not be used or the rank worn outside the state.
Although CNN claimed they verified Kerr’s military background and that he had not contributed any money to any presidential candidate, it’s unlikely that no one at the network was aware of his identity within the Clinton campaign.
But whether they had knowledge or not, it was CNN’s journalistic responsibility to find out.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23698
There’s More to the Keith Kerr Story
by Ericka Andersen
Posted: 11/29/2007
Thanks. Should have known that, but didn’t
Why can’t Republicans be ruthless SOB’s? Why must we require that they be perfect prissy men? With perfect lives, perfect wives, perfect kids, perfect records, perfect votes, perfect hair, perfect suits, perfect speech, etc.
This is why we have been walked over FOR FORTY YEARS RUNNING, our candidates have been reduced to robots, performing for the media and us, no human qualities, no disagreements, no passion, no emotion, and on and on.
(sorry for the rant)
Thanks. Should have known that, but didn’t
then be prepared for President Hillary.
No if's, no and's, no but's.
Frankly, I'm sick of this idiotic idea that standing on principle excuses endangering the country. And please spare me the hyperbolic sanctimony that Rudy or Romney or Thompson or whichever Republican candidate would be as bad for the country as Hillary. That's bulldust.
The fact is that Hillary would be a disaster.And there isn't a Republican running that would be even remotely close to creating the nightmare that would be a Hillary Presidency.
The suggestion that Rudy or Thompson or Huckabee or Hunter or whichever candidate gets your goat would be as bad as Hillary is flat out dishonest.
I exclude RuPaul from any of the above since he isn't a Republican. He's an anti-Semitic nutjob.
I’m not sad. Rudy is not much different from Bill Clinton in morals or politics.
How do you know that?
You are most welcome, sir.
Missed the 1st 45 minutes today. Sounds like he’s just getting started on the debate last night.
hey hey... good to see everyone
This debate should be referred to as the “Vegetarian debate:”
Plants and Nuts.
Dropped his keys.
Mistake.
(of course I personally have never seen him in action, lol)
We'll have her for 8 years, and country will continue to become more, not less, liberal... You can bank on it
I'd even bet we won't see another GOP Senate or House in our lifetime, maybe not a GOP President in 20 years....
Thanks for your post
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.