[padre35]

And he voted against them.

Try again Mnherling...

[mnehring]

...and if he didn’t put them in the bills he knew he would pass, the earmarks wouldn’t exist in the first place.. nice attempt to justify Paula’s games.

[MNJohnnie]

And he voted against them. Try again Mnherling..

Which is a meaningless sophistry. Try again Paulbots.

Voting against a bill when his vote was completely meaningless in deciding the outcome after sticking in earmarks is hypocritical. A real "Consitutionalist" would of stood on his principals and not put the earmaks in. Paul's position on earmarks totally destroys his credibility on the issue of Limited Govt. He is yet another politician who says one thing while campaigning and does another while in DC