Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lando Lincoln; neverdem; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; Valin; King Prout; SJackson; dennisw; ...
Jonah Goldberg:

...Successful “hyperpowers” tend to be more tolerant and inclusive than their competitors. Despite its flaws, Britain was the first truly liberal empire. America has picked up where the British left off. Whatever sway the U.S. holds over far-flung reaches of the globe is derived from the fact that we have been, and hopefully shall continue to be, the leader of the free world, offering help and guidance, peace and prosperity, where and when we can, as best we can, and asking little in return. If that makes us an empire, so be it. But I think “leader of the free world” is the only label we’ll ever need or — one hopes — ever want.


Nailed It!

This ping list is not author-specific for articles I'd like to share. Some for the perfect moral clarity, some for provocative thoughts; or simply interesting articles I'd hate to miss myself. (I don't have to agree with the author all 100% to feel the need to share an article.) I will try not to abuse the ping list and not to annoy you too much, but on some days there is more of the good stuff that is worthy of attention. You can see the list of articles I pinged to lately  on  my page.
You are welcome in or out, just freepmail me (and note which PING list you are talking about). Besides this one, I keep 2 separate PING lists for my favorite authors Victor Davis Hanson and Orson Scott Card.  

2 posted on 11/28/2007 12:24:00 PM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolik
When the Archbishop of Canterbury accused the US of pursing Imperialism in Iraq, Colin Powell supposedly said to the effect of this

During the last century the US has fought in many places for the freedom of many people. In the end, all we have ever asked from those people is enough land to bury our dead.

The notion that there is “An American Empire” is pure hysteric drivel screamed by idiot level IQs who have utterly no grasp of historic, or current, reality.

5 posted on 11/28/2007 1:03:15 PM PST by MNJohnnie (What drug pushers do with drugs, politicians do with government subsides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik

In recent years, however, there’s been an attempt to rehabilitate the e-word. Historian Niall Ferguson deserves primary credit for the mainstreaming of the empire debate with his 2004 book Colossus. He faced the empire charge head-on, saying, in effect, “Yeah, so what’s your point?” The world needs a stabilizing watchman to keep the bad guys in check and to promote trade, he argued, and America is the best candidate for the job.

**********************************

Regardless of the PC status of the word “Empire”, an “Empire” usually has an emporer.

Now, if we continue along this line of massive immigration, then we may officially become an empire, as America balkanizes, and we would have to reconquer or recolonize the States.


19 posted on 11/28/2007 9:50:05 PM PST by Hunterite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson